From chart3399 at gmail.com Mon Apr 27 09:27:10 2020 From: chart3399 at gmail.com (Corey Hart) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Simbody-users] OSS License Used - Site vs GitHub Message-ID: Hi, Trying to determine which OSS license Simbody is released under. - github source shows Apache 2.0 in LICENSE.txt - Downloads section on simbody site shows MIT - Wiki shows MIT License Just trying to determine which one is the correct license and help fix any irregularities. Thank You, Corey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From msherman at stanford.edu Mon Apr 27 09:53:17 2020 From: msherman at stanford.edu (Michael Sherman) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:53:17 -0700 Subject: [Simbody-users] OSS License Used - Site vs GitHub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005d01d61cb4$62607d30$27217790$@stanford.edu> Hi, Corey. The GitHub source is up to date and correct – Apache 2.0 is the license. I managed to fix the Wiki but am still trying to figure out how to fix that (ancient, 2013) downloads section. Hopefully no one is using it! Regards, Sherm From: Simbody-users On Behalf Of Corey Hart Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 9:27 AM To: simbody-users at simtk.org Subject: [Simbody-users] OSS License Used - Site vs GitHub Hi, Trying to determine which OSS license Simbody is released under. * github source shows Apache 2.0 in LICENSE.txt * Downloads section on simbody site shows MIT * Wiki shows MIT License Just trying to determine which one is the correct license and help fix any irregularities. Thank You, Corey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: