Diff for "RecurringMeetings/2014-11-26"

Differences between revisions 1 and 2

Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic - University of Utah

Date: November 26, 2014

Time: 2:00 PM EST

Means: Conference call

Attendees:

Ahmet Erdemir (Cleveland Clinic)
Jeff Weiss (University of Utah)
Ben Ellis (University of Utah)
Steve Maas (University of Utah)

Agenda:

Update on feature implementations.
1. In situ strain - http://wiki.simtk.org/openknee/Febio/InSituStrain
2. Set definitions - http://wiki.simtk.org/openknee/Febio/SetDefinitions
3. Connector elements - http://wiki.simtk.org/openknee/Febio/RigidBodyMotions
Recap on FEBio segmentation fault issues during simulations.
Decide action items for next meeting.
Other.

Immediate Action Items:

Cleveland Clinic (Ahmet & Craig)
- Start testing in situ strain feature in relevance to its use in Open Knee(s).
University of Utah (Steve)
- Prepare a draft of a manuscript about in situ strain feature.

Notes:

Update on feature implementations.
- Based on the last conference call and CMBBE 2014 presentation, in situ strain feature is in good shape. The feature is currently provided as a plug-in. There were discussions to incorporate this this capability in the core of FEBio code (probably not). Steve will start working on the manuscript, the goal is to get a draft ready by the next meeting. The Cleveland Clinic team will start testing this feature to assure it fits their needs. This testing will also help evaluate the plug-in framework.
- Steve changed how node sets are defined. This was necessitated by the need to handle XML file more effectively and it conforms to the way that element and surface sets are defined. Ahmet also noted that the new definition syntax may help Python scripting as well. Currently both the newer and older formats are supported. In PostView, one can select surfaces, node sets, or parts.
FEBio issues during simulations.
- TBD
Recap on FEBio segmentation fault issues during simulations.
- TBD
Other.
- TBD

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2014-11-28 14:44:33 → 
  Size: 976
  Editor: aerdemir
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 2 as of 2014-11-28 14:55:57 → ⇥
  Size: 2142
  Editor: aerdemir
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 15:
-. TBD
+. Ahmet Erdemir (Cleveland Clinic)
 1. Jeff Weiss (University of Utah)
 1. Ben Ellis (University of Utah)
 1. Steve Maas (University of Utah)
-Line 29:
+Line 32:
- * Cleveland Clinic (TBD)
  * TBD
 * University of Utah (TBD)
  * TBD
+ * Cleveland Clinic (Ahmet & Craig)
  * Start testing in situ strain feature in relevance to its use in Open Knee(s).
 * University of Utah (Steve)
  * Prepare a draft of a manuscript about in situ strain feature.
-Line 37:
+Line 40:
-  * TBD
+  * Based on the last conference call and CMBBE 2014 presentation, in situ strain feature is in good shape. The feature is currently provided as a plug-in. There were discussions to incorporate this this capability in the core of FEBio code (probably not). Steve will start working on the manuscript, the goal is to get a draft ready by the next meeting. The Cleveland Clinic team will start testing this feature to assure it fits their needs. This testing will also help evaluate the plug-in framework.
  * Steve changed how node sets are defined. This was necessitated by the need to handle XML file more effectively and it conforms to the way that element and surface sets are defined. Ahmet also noted that the new definition syntax may help Python scripting as well. Currently both the newer and older formats are supported. In !PostView, one can select surfaces, node sets, or parts.