Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2015-09-22 15:10:17
Size: 2090
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2015-09-23 15:20:37
Size: 3816
Editor: snehalkc
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 62: Line 62:
  * TBD   * Ahmet disseminated joint mechanics data for three specimens: oks001; oks002; oks006.
  * Ahmet informed the group about specific data missing in oks003 and oks007 folders in the in-house data management system.
  * Craig provided documentation of meshing workflow. Snehal will test it.
  * Snehal talked to Anatomy Gifts Registry and learned that it will take some time to receive young specimens.
  * Snehal identified a smaller framing system similar to 80/20 for building the optical thickness measurement system frame. It was ordered and will be delivered this week.
 
Line 64: Line 69:
  * TBD   * Snehal received information from Scientific Data regarding the suitability of the Open Knees data for publication. One option is to have a large paper including all the data. The other is to submit multiple papers simultaneously for theme based review.
  * Ahmet recommended three parts for first submission:
    * Part 1: imaging
    * Part 2: tibiofemoral joint testing
    * Part 3: patellofemoral joint testing
    (Part 2 and Part 3 may need to be combined together later)
  * The discussion will continue to decide on how to present the tissue mechanical testing data. It may be divided based on tissue types for separate publications or may be submitted as one set depending on the kind of data assessment/analysis added.
  * The team went to Scientific Data manuscript outline to discuss individual components.
  * There is no conflict in uploading to their site, e.g. Dryad even though the data is being disseminated on Simtk. The Simtk dissemination will be an evolving process which will eventually include the analyses whereas, the Dryad can be a mirror for the data set as it is published.
Line 66: Line 80:
  * TBD   * See immediate action items above.
Line 68: Line 83:
  * TBD   * None noted.

Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic Core Team

Date: September 22, 2015

Time: 10:30 AM EST

Means: In person meeting

Attendees:

  1. Ahmet Erdemir
  2. Snehal Chokhandre
  3. Tara Bonner

Agenda:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
  2. Discuss potential publications.
  3. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
  4. Other.

Immediate Action Items:

  • Ahmet
    • Disseminate joint mechanics testing data for oks004 and oks008.
    • Prepare flowcharts to describe data flow for pre-processing of joint kinematics/kinetics data.
  • Craig
    • Explore hexahedral meshing workflows in Salome for STL surfaces.
    • Document in the relevant wiki page convergence of Open Knee(s) - Generation 1 model when using springs.
    • Prepare outline of imaging data manuscript with reference to Scientific Data journal format
  • Snehal
    • Go over meshing documentation provided by Craig to evaluate the reproducibility of meshing strategies.
  • Robb and Tara
    • Upload left knee coordinate system versions of joint mechanics data for oks003.
    • Upload post-calibration file for contact pressure data of oks007.
  • Tara
    • Prepare outline of tibiofemoral joint data manuscript with reference to Scientific Data journal format.
  • Robb
    • Prepare outline of patellofemoral joint data manuscript with reference to Scientific Data journal format.

Ongoing Action Items:

  • Craig
    • Anatomical imaging manuscript.
    • Large-scale analysis of simulation parameters for convergence.
  • Snehal
    • Pivot shift manuscript.
    • Cruciate ligament modeling & simulation.

  • Robb
    • Patellofemoral joint experimentation manuscript.
  • Tara
    • Tibiofemoral joint experimentation manuscript.

Notes:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
    • Ahmet disseminated joint mechanics data for three specimens: oks001; oks002; oks006.
    • Ahmet informed the group about specific data missing in oks003 and oks007 folders in the in-house data management system.
    • Craig provided documentation of meshing workflow. Snehal will test it.
    • Snehal talked to Anatomy Gifts Registry and learned that it will take some time to receive young specimens.
    • Snehal identified a smaller framing system similar to 80/20 for building the optical thickness measurement system frame. It was ordered and will be delivered this week.
  2. Discuss potential publications.
    • Snehal received information from Scientific Data regarding the suitability of the Open Knees data for publication. One option is to have a large paper including all the data. The other is to submit multiple papers simultaneously for theme based review.
    • Ahmet recommended three parts for first submission:
      • Part 1: imaging
      • Part 2: tibiofemoral joint testing
      • Part 3: patellofemoral joint testing (Part 2 and Part 3 may need to be combined together later)
    • The discussion will continue to decide on how to present the tissue mechanical testing data. It may be divided based on tissue types for separate publications or may be submitted as one set depending on the kind of data assessment/analysis added.
    • The team went to Scientific Data manuscript outline to discuss individual components.
    • There is no conflict in uploading to their site, e.g. Dryad even though the data is being disseminated on Simtk. The Simtk dissemination will be an evolving process which will eventually include the analyses whereas, the Dryad can be a mirror for the data set as it is published.
  3. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
    • See immediate action items above.
  4. Other.
    • None noted.

RecurringMeetings/2015-09-22 (last edited 2016-05-04 22:09:52 by localhost)