Search found 10 matches
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 1:37 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 54822
Re: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
issue solved... thank you.
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:32 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 54822
Re: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
Ok, in that case it might be a bug? I tried it out on two different machines, both times resulting in the same error msg: Exception: Parse error in expression "(tabulatedFct(lookup1,lookup2)/r)^2": unknown function: tabulatedFct here the files to reproduce the error: https://byu.box.com/s/7vnrlpd86d...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:05 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 54822
Re: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
I have been digging through the documentation, but maybe html syntax is the issue here. When it says "To define a function, include a <Function> tag inside the <CustomNonbondedForce> or <CustomGBForce> tag", I thought it means: <CustomNonbondedForce energy="tabulatedfct(lookup1,lookup2)" bondCutoff=...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:20 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 54822
Re: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
Thank you, Peter. I am struggling with addTabulatedFunction inside of the forcefield .html: <CustomNonbondedForce energy="(Bij(lookup1,lookup2)/r)^2" bondCutoff="3"> <PerParticleParameter name="lookup"/> <Atom type="0" lookup="0"/> <Atom type="1" lookup="1"/> <Function name="Bij" type="Discrete2DFun...
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:59 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PDBreporter: Write only a Protein to trajectory
- Replies: 1
- Views: 80
PDBreporter: Write only a Protein to trajectory
Hello,
Very basic question that I could not find an answer to. How can I tell the PDBreporter to only write out the protein coordinates and omit solvent/ions? My trajectories are unnecessarily large as I do not care about solvent positions.
Thank you,
Dennis
Very basic question that I could not find an answer to. How can I tell the PDBreporter to only write out the protein coordinates and omit solvent/ions? My trajectories are unnecessarily large as I do not care about solvent positions.
Thank you,
Dennis
- Mon Mar 16, 2020 2:18 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 54822
CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
Hello, I am looking for an elegant way to encode non-bonded interactions that are dependent on the atom-pair for an ions only simulation. Example: Atomtype A Atomtype B Atomtype C Functional form: V(r) = interaction_AB / r_AB I would need to parametrize a forcefield to contain all the pairwise terms...
- Fri Mar 13, 2020 1:12 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomExternalForce - Odd Position behavior
- Replies: 1
- Views: 93
CustomExternalForce - Odd Position behavior
Hello, I am adding position restraints via a CustomExternalForce according to methods described here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/prot.25759 Unfortunately, I seem to run into problems with PBCs as discussed elsewhere on the forum/issue tracker. The error I get suggests a blow up...
- Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:02 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CUDA Performance with newer Driver
- Replies: 5
- Views: 193
Re: CUDA Performance with newer Driver
Thank you Peter, this was very helpful. We have now CUDA10.0 installed and I get the following performance in agreement with your description: Number GPU 1, ns / day = 158.2310109781112 Number GPU 2, ns / day = 214.0911588615499 Number GPU 3, ns / day = 195.70180466219216 Number GPU 4, ns / day = 17...
- Tue Mar 10, 2020 8:19 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CUDA Performance with newer Driver
- Replies: 5
- Views: 193
Re: CUDA Performance with newer Driver
Thank you for the speedy reply. Here a lengthy, but hopefully complete description of the situation: python -m simtk.testInstallation: OpenMM Version: 7.4.1 Git Revision: 068f120206160d5151c9af0baf810384bba8d052 There are 4 Platforms available: 1 Reference - Successfully computed forces 2 CPU - Succ...
- Tue Mar 10, 2020 4:04 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CUDA Performance with newer Driver
- Replies: 5
- Views: 193
CUDA Performance with newer Driver
Hello, I attempted to benchmark OpenMM on a new Cluster with 8 Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 and CUDA10.2 installed. For a test protein with 120 AA with explicit solvent ~50,000 atoms, I get a performance of ~5ns / day on 4 GPUs. Checking utilization with nvidia-smi shows ~95% usage of GPUs. I found a post...