ok thanks, so the only issue was a change in the default recursion limit setting between 7.3 and 7.4?
thanks,
Jesse
Search found 10 matches
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:37 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: bug for periodic-bonded residues in OpenMM 7.4?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 88
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:40 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: bug for periodic-bonded residues in OpenMM 7.4?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 88
bug for periodic-bonded residues in OpenMM 7.4?
Hi Peter, It looks to me like there's a bug in version 7.4.0/7.4.1 for matching residues that are bonding over periodic images. Code/input files that were working with 7.3 suddenly crash with either 7.4.0/7.4.1 with the error File "/nv/hp22/jmcdaniel43/.conda/envs/openmm74/lib/python3.7/site-package...
- Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:00 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenCLkernel/multipleGPUs/Drudeforce/OpenMM 7.2 bug?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 173
Re: OpenCLkernel/multipleGPUs/Drudeforce/OpenMM 7.2 bug?
Thanks for the quick fix Peter, much appreciated!
- Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:07 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenCLkernel/multipleGPUs/Drudeforce/OpenMM 7.2 bug?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 173
OpenCLkernel/multipleGPUs/Drudeforce/OpenMM 7.2 bug?
Hi all, I'm getting weird energies/simulation results in the special case of simulations with polarizable force fields with the OpenCL kernel running a simulation on 2 GPUs--i think this might be a bug. I'm using OpenMM version 7.2 (cuda 9.0/GTX-1080's but that shouldn't matter...). A similar issue ...
- Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:02 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Thermodynamic Integration-PME
- Replies: 4
- Views: 242
Re: Thermodynamic Integration-PME
sure, i'll let you know when I'm done with the reference
- Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:57 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Thermodynamic Integration-PME
- Replies: 4
- Views: 242
Re: Thermodynamic Integration-PME
I think it's doable. If you're computing reciprocal space forces using equation 4.9 in the original PME paper (Essmann JCP 103, 8577, 1995), there's no real difference between taking derivatives of the Q grid w.r.t. cartesian coordinates or a charge scale factor (in fact the latter is easier). And s...
- Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:02 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Thermodynamic Integration-PME
- Replies: 4
- Views: 242
Thermodynamic Integration-PME
Hi Peter, I need to do thermodynamic integration, and of course need energy derivatives w.r.t. scaling parameters. You've obviously already envisioned this, by enabling methods 'addGlobalParameter' and 'addEnergyParameterDerivative' to most of the force classes, including 'CustomNonbondedForce','Cus...
- Fri Aug 25, 2017 6:24 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PBC bonded forces on GPU
- Replies: 6
- Views: 310
Re: PBC bonded forces on GPU
Hi Peter,
Thanks very much for your time in sorting this out. Much appreciated.
Best,
Jesse
Thanks very much for your time in sorting this out. Much appreciated.
Best,
Jesse
- Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:02 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PBC bonded forces on GPU
- Replies: 6
- Views: 310
Re: PBC bonded forces on GPU
Hi Peter, Yes, I did this with the following code: for i in range(system.getNumForces()): f = system.getForce(i) print(type(f)) f.setForceGroup(i) if type(f) == HarmonicBondForce or type(f) == HarmonicAngleForce or type(f) == PeriodicTorsionForce or type(f) == RBTorsionForce: f.setUsesPeriodicBounda...
- Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:30 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PBC bonded forces on GPU
- Replies: 6
- Views: 310
PBC bonded forces on GPU
Hi all, I am trying to simulate systems that include graphene sheets, which have bonds, angles, and dihedral terms that cross the PBC. According to Fix #1411, this should be implemented in CPU, CUDA, and OpenCL kernels. I am using OpenMM 7.1.1. I find that with CPU kernels, the bonded energy terms o...