Search found 12 matches
- Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:12 pm
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1944
Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
At what point does a model transition from a "toy model" to a realistic one whose results can be regarded as a reasonably realistic? To me three flexors and three extensors seem sufficient for elbow flexion control, but I appreciate that shoulder flexion/extension muscles are underrepresented. How c...
- Fri Sep 14, 2018 12:51 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1944
Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Hi James, Thank you very much for your answers. Your explanations make sense, but I'm still having difficulty understanding these static optimization results... I've done what you suggested in the figure below: (a) extracted the moment arms for each muscle, (b) computed muscle moments, (c) computed ...
- Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:19 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1944
Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
That sounds plausible, but if that were true why do the extensor forces return to zero at about 150 deg flexion as depicted in the figure below? Shouldn't there be greater passive extensor force at 150 deg than at 90 deg?
- Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:34 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1944
Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Hello, I'm trying to understand static optimization results for the arm26 model for different elbow angles. The results are depicted in the figure below. static-optimization.png These extensor results are not what I was expecting. I understand that the solution depends on the muscles' force-length r...
- Tue May 03, 2016 6:15 pm
- Forum: Simbody: SimTK multibody dynamics API
- Topic: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1022
Re: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
Hi Chris, thanks so much for your fast reply! I've now got everything working, but I'll follow up with details just in case anyone else is new to cmake like me. First, you're correct, the actual compiler I was using was clang. I tried to write my own compiler command because I've used gcc and g++ to...
- Tue May 03, 2016 2:21 am
- Forum: Simbody: SimTK multibody dynamics API
- Topic: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1022
Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
Hi, I've been able to successfully build and install simbody on Mac 10.11, and I'm able to successfully run the examples: cd /usr/local/SimTK/share/doc/simbody/examples/bin ./SimbodyInstallTest ./ExamplePendulum I'm now trying to compile and run ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ as follows: g++ ExampleP...
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:56 am
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1275
Re: Version 2 boundary conditions
Great, thanks for that Ahmet.
And thanks again for sharing this fabulous resource with the community!
Todd
And thanks again for sharing this fabulous resource with the community!
Todd
- Wed Mar 04, 2015 8:17 pm
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1275
Re: Version 2 boundary conditions
Understood, thanks for clarifying.
Just curious: is that flexed-posture loading meant to relate to a particular in vitro loading experiment or a particular in vivo task?
Just curious: is that flexed-posture loading meant to relate to a particular in vitro loading experiment or a particular in vivo task?
- Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:18 pm
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1275
Version 2 boundary conditions
Hi Ahmet, I have a question about the boundary conditions as implemented in Version 2 of the Generation 1 model. From what I can see in the FEB file (tf_joint_FEBio_v2.feb), it appears that the prescribed kinematics are applied over the interval 0 to 1 s, but in version 1 this was done over the inte...
- Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:59 pm
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: FEBio v.2.1 compatibility
- Replies: 2
- Views: 893
Re: FEBio v.2.1 compatibility
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your fast reply.
Problem solved! Everything seems to work fine with the newest FEBio version (v.2.2)
Thanks!
Todd
Thanks for your fast reply.
Problem solved! Everything seems to work fine with the newest FEBio version (v.2.2)
Thanks!
Todd