Search found 14 matches
- Thu Feb 13, 2025 12:43 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Moco Track and external stimulation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 610
Re: Moco Track and external stimulation
Hi Nicholas. This is what I was afraid of. Even with a simple model the outer-loop optimization direction seems intimidating to me. Maybe I will stick to the solution I currently have and try to track down the problem adopting a sensitivity analysis approach. Kind regards and thanks a lot for your s...
- Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:22 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Moco Track and external stimulation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 610
Re: Moco Track and external stimulation
Greetings again, I have managed to model external excitations for certain muscles using the moco control tracking goal and the prescribed controller method. Therefore, i track a reference motion of a patient and observe how different signals change the kinematics. I would like to ask the following. ...
- Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:25 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Moco Track and external stimulation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 610
Re: Moco Track and external stimulation
Hi Nick,
thanks a lot for your prompt and detailed reply. I will give it a try and see how things go.
Best,
Kostas
thanks a lot for your prompt and detailed reply. I will give it a try and see how things go.
Best,
Kostas
- Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:25 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Moco Track and external stimulation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 610
Moco Track and external stimulation
Greetings everyone, I have some kinematic data of post-stroke patients and i would like to investigate possible rehabilitation strategies. I would like to know if i can use Moco Track and somehow model external stimulation effect (mimicking FES for example) to study how this affects (improves or not...
- Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:01 am
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Kinematics data channel name conventions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1951
Re: Kinematics data channel name conventions
Greetings again, I have one more question. Navigating through the kinematics data provided, I noticed that for some subjects there are multiple passive flexion records (e.g oks008). I guess this is for optimizing the femoral coordinate system as it is described in the readme.txt. I would like to ask...
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:38 am
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Kinematics data channel name conventions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1951
Re: Kinematics data channel name conventions
Dear Dr Erdemir,
Thanks a lot for your prompt answer and the provided links.
Kind regards,
Kostas
----
Konstantinos Risvas
Dipl.-Ing. MSc Electrical and Computer Engineer
Research Associate, VVR group
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Patras
26500, Rio-Patras, Greece
Thanks a lot for your prompt answer and the provided links.
Kind regards,
Kostas
----
Konstantinos Risvas
Dipl.-Ing. MSc Electrical and Computer Engineer
Research Associate, VVR group
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Patras
26500, Rio-Patras, Greece
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 2:17 am
- Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
- Topic: Kinematics data channel name conventions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1951
Kinematics data channel name conventions
Greetings everyone, I would like to ask a question about the name conventions in the provided kinematics data (tdms files). From what I have seen in the specifications, the data are recorded with the tibia fixed and the femur free. If that is indeed the case, then the 'Posterior Translation" channel...
- Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:31 am
- Forum: SCONE
- Topic: Scenario optimization: waiting for first evaluation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29426
Re: Scenario optimization: waiting for first evaluation
I am on Windows 10
- Sat May 30, 2020 3:53 pm
- Forum: SCONE
- Topic: ReactionForceMeasure range issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 290
ReactionForceMeasure range issue
Greetings, When applying the ReactionForceMeasure and trying to define the valid force range, SCONE comes up with an "Invalid scenario settings" message. This happens only if i add the range parameter, e.g. ReactionForceMeasure { range = {min = 1000 max = 2000} start_time = 0.2 minimize = true } In ...
- Sat May 30, 2020 3:44 pm
- Forum: SCONE
- Topic: Scenario optimization: waiting for first evaluation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29426
Re: Scenario optimization: waiting for first evaluation
I managed to overcome this issue by setting the parameter "Perform optimization using external process" to 0, under the Tools/Preferences/User Interface tab.