Search found 806 matches
- Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:18 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: Inverse Dynamics
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2841
RE: Inverse Dynamics
<t>Thanks, J-O.<br/> <br/> Your code looks perfectly reasonable to me. It appears that the static symbol SimTK::Stage::HighestValid is not being found in SimTKcommon.lib where it should be. This is of course a very common symbol since it is used as the default value for the second realize() paramete...
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:47 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: Inverse Dynamics
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2841
RE: Inverse Dynamics
Hi, J-O. Can you capture the link messages and post them? Thanks, Sherm
- Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:03 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OPENMM installation problem
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1352
RE: OPENMM installation problem
<t>The output you sent contains a real error and a bunch of warnings. The real error is that it couldn't find memset(). That should be defined in header #include <cstring>, not <string>. So you might need to change that include fine name also.<br/> <br/> The warnings are complaining that a string co...
- Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:00 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OPENMM installation problem
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1352
RE: OPENMM installation problem
I think you want #include <cstdlib> rather than <stdlib>.
Sherm
Sherm
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:29 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: getNWhatever() vs. getNumWhatever() in API
- Replies: 3
- Views: 521
RE: getNWhatever() vs. getNumWhatever() in API
P.S. This is now a SimTK coding standard: when we need to return a count of something, we use getNumBlahs() always rather than getNBlahs(). Please tell your friends!
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:27 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: getNWhatever() vs. getNumWhatever() in API
- Replies: 3
- Views: 521
RE: getNWhatever() vs. getNumWhatever() in API
I've heard no objections, so this change is going in to SimTK 2.0. I'll try to get the new names in earlier as preferred alternates, but the old ones have to stay around for SimTK 1.6 for compatibiliy.
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:26 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: Renaming the "Q" matrix
- Replies: 1
- Views: 243
RE: Renaming the "Q" matrix
<t>No one seems to be defending the existing choice, and I haven't heard any better choices than "N", so I'm going to rename Q to N in the near future unless someone screams.<br/> <br/> The old names won't be removed until SimTK 2.0 because it is a (mildly) breaking change to the API. However, I wil...
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:22 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: long double, R.I.P.?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 377
RE: long double, R.I.P.?
I've heard no objections, so "long double" support in SimTK is dead and will disappear soon.
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:21 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: Do we need all those "Static" test cases?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2001
RE: Do we need all those "Static" test cases?
<t>To close out this thread, the answer appears to be "yes, we do need all those static test cases!". However, I have now modified the CMake scripts so that you can turn off static, dynamic, or all tests selectively.<br/> <br/> The nightly builds will continue building both static and dynamic versio...
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:18 pm
- Forum: SimTK Core Toolset
- Topic: CMake files updated for more control
- Replies: 0
- Views: 151
CMake files updated for more control
<t>I updated the CMake files for projects:<br/> SimTKcommon<br/> Simmath<br/> Simbody<br/> Molmodel<br/> (sorry, didn't do Cpodes).<br/> <br/> Now you can control whether to build aux, tests, and examples via CMake variables, and you can control whether to build static and/or dynamic (DLL) test and ...