Search found 12 matches

by Todd Pataky
Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:12 pm
Forum: OpenSim
Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Replies: 8
Views: 1235

Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles

At what point does a model transition from a "toy model" to a realistic one whose results can be regarded as a reasonably realistic? To me three flexors and three extensors seem sufficient for elbow flexion control, but I appreciate that shoulder flexion/extension muscles are underrepresented. How c...
by Todd Pataky
Fri Sep 14, 2018 12:51 am
Forum: OpenSim
Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Replies: 8
Views: 1235

Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles

Hi James, Thank you very much for your answers. Your explanations make sense, but I'm still having difficulty understanding these static optimization results... I've done what you suggested in the figure below: (a) extracted the moment arms for each muscle, (b) computed muscle moments, (c) computed ...
by Todd Pataky
Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:19 am
Forum: OpenSim
Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Replies: 8
Views: 1235

Re: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles

That sounds plausible, but if that were true why do the extensor forces return to zero at about 150 deg flexion as depicted in the figure below? Shouldn't there be greater passive extensor force at 150 deg than at 90 deg?

static-optimizationA.png
static-optimizationA.png (271.11 KiB) Viewed 1193 times
by Todd Pataky
Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:34 am
Forum: OpenSim
Topic: Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles
Replies: 8
Views: 1235

Arm26 static optimization results for different elbow angles

Hello, I'm trying to understand static optimization results for the arm26 model for different elbow angles. The results are depicted in the figure below. static-optimization.png These extensor results are not what I was expecting. I understand that the solution depends on the muscles' force-length r...
by Todd Pataky
Tue May 03, 2016 6:15 pm
Forum: Simbody: SimTK multibody dynamics API
Topic: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
Replies: 3
Views: 659

Re: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11

Hi Chris, thanks so much for your fast reply! I've now got everything working, but I'll follow up with details just in case anyone else is new to cmake like me. First, you're correct, the actual compiler I was using was clang. I tried to write my own compiler command because I've used gcc and g++ to...
by Todd Pataky
Tue May 03, 2016 2:21 am
Forum: Simbody: SimTK multibody dynamics API
Topic: Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11
Replies: 3
Views: 659

Compiling ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ on Mac 10.11

Hi, I've been able to successfully build and install simbody on Mac 10.11, and I'm able to successfully run the examples: cd /usr/local/SimTK/share/doc/simbody/examples/bin ./SimbodyInstallTest ./ExamplePendulum I'm now trying to compile and run ExamplePendulum.cpp using g++ as follows: g++ ExampleP...
by Todd Pataky
Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:56 am
Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
Replies: 4
Views: 776

Re: Version 2 boundary conditions

Great, thanks for that Ahmet.
And thanks again for sharing this fabulous resource with the community!
Todd
by Todd Pataky
Wed Mar 04, 2015 8:17 pm
Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
Replies: 4
Views: 776

Re: Version 2 boundary conditions

Understood, thanks for clarifying.

Just curious: is that flexed-posture loading meant to relate to a particular in vitro loading experiment or a particular in vivo task?
by Todd Pataky
Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:18 pm
Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
Topic: Version 2 boundary conditions
Replies: 4
Views: 776

Version 2 boundary conditions

Hi Ahmet, I have a question about the boundary conditions as implemented in Version 2 of the Generation 1 model. From what I can see in the FEB file (tf_joint_FEBio_v2.feb), it appears that the prescribed kinematics are applied over the interval 0 to 1 s, but in version 1 this was done over the inte...
by Todd Pataky
Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:59 pm
Forum: Open Knee: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Representation of the Knee Joint
Topic: FEBio v.2.1 compatibility
Replies: 2
Views: 524

Re: FEBio v.2.1 compatibility

Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your fast reply.
Problem solved! Everything seems to work fine with the newest FEBio version (v.2.2)
Thanks!
Todd