Hi Peter,
I've implemented the function to get permanent dipoles in the lab frame on both, the reference and CUDA platforms. I've checked the results manually against TINKER for a pure water box, and they match. Should I submit a pull request?
Thanks.
Saurabh
Search found 32 matches
- Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:55 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Print dipol vectors
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1546
- Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:38 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Print dipol vectors
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1546
Re: Print dipol vectors
Hi Peter, I've forked and cloned the git repo, and am working on implementing the function. However, I was wondering how I should compile the code to test whatever I am coding up. The installation instructions in the user guide only outline the installations for the binaries, and I can't find any ob...
- Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:45 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Print dipol vectors
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1546
Re: Print dipol vectors
Hi Peter, I've found the function which returns the induced dipoles, and was able to use it. I was also wondering about the permanent dipoles in order to get the total dipole for each atom in the system. Lee-Ping mentioned in his last post on this thread that it would have to be implemented, and out...
- Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:59 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Print dipol vectors
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1546
Re: Print dipol vectors
Hi,
Has this function to get the permanent dipoles rotated in the lab frame been implemented?
Thanks.
Saurabh
Has this function to get the permanent dipoles rotated in the lab frame been implemented?
Thanks.
Saurabh
- Fri Dec 04, 2015 11:50 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Can't find CUDA on OSX 10.11 El Capitain
- Replies: 5
- Views: 969
Re: Can't find CUDA on OSX 10.11 El Capitain
Hi, I was facing this problem in October, and I wrote to CUDA. They initially replied saying that OSx 10.11 was not supported by any of their CUDA Tools versions, and then got back to me a few days later saying that they had only put up a new version of CUDA 7.5 which was compatible with OSx 10.11. ...
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 8:57 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PDBReporter options
- Replies: 5
- Views: 830
Re: PDBReporter options
Thanks! This is definitely the way I should be going, instead of writing the whole system and then removing the waters. However, when I'm trying to set up the simulation as outlined in http://mdtraj.org/latest/examples/openmm.html , I am unable to use PME for the nonbondedMethod. It gives the follow...
- Wed Oct 14, 2015 12:33 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PDBReporter options
- Replies: 5
- Views: 830
Re: PDBReporter options
Thanks for the code!
I could save these binary formats. However, I want to further analyze the trajectories that are generated using my own scripts. Is there any of these binary formats that could then easily be converted to PDB for processing after the simulation is completed?
Thank you.
I could save these binary formats. However, I want to further analyze the trajectories that are generated using my own scripts. Is there any of these binary formats that could then easily be converted to PDB for processing after the simulation is completed?
Thank you.
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:21 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PDBReporter options
- Replies: 5
- Views: 830
PDBReporter options
Hi,
I'm simulating a solvated protein. Is there any way to configure PDBReporter to write the trajectory only for the protein atoms, and not write out the waters?
Thank you.
I'm simulating a solvated protein. Is there any way to configure PDBReporter to write the trajectory only for the protein atoms, and not write out the waters?
Thank you.
- Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:50 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomExternalForce defined functions....
- Replies: 4
- Views: 384
Re: CustomExternalForce defined functions....
Hi Dr. Eastman,
I think I've been able to add the force I'm looking for using the global parameter update, as you've suggested.
Thank you.
I think I've been able to add the force I'm looking for using the global parameter update, as you've suggested.
Thank you.
- Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:19 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomExternalForce defined functions....
- Replies: 4
- Views: 384
Re: CustomExternalForce defined functions....
Hi Dr. Eastman,
Has this feature been implemented? If not, if I use the global parameter, as you have suggested, is there a cost associated with setting the parameter at, say each time step?
Thank you.
Has this feature been implemented? If not, if I use the global parameter, as you have suggested, is there a cost associated with setting the parameter at, say each time step?
Thank you.