Search found 42 matches
- Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:36 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Workflows & Standards & good practices
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8676
Re: Workflows & Standards & good practices
Hi Tony, Not a problem, and thanks for sharing your definition. I like it! Can you also upload it to the CPMS Glossary wiki page? I it will be a great source we can draw from to come up with a Committee definition. In fact, we encourage you and anyone else to look through our list of definitions and...
- Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:01 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Workflows & Standards & good practices
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8676
Re: Workflows & Standards & good practices
Hi Tony, I suppose it is difficult to succinctly define this term in one or two sentences, particularly for such a multidisciplinary field of application. So I understand why the definition may not be helpful to you. I understand it perhaps I've naturally worked in an environment where this definiti...
- Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:32 am
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Workflows & Standards & good practices
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8676
Re: Workflows & Standards & good practices
Ahmet and Tony, You both make great points. My general experience has been that, irrespective of the type of model or context, the workflow can be maintained fairly standard. However, Ahmet makes an excellent point in that it may depend on the intensity and risk associated. For example, if you're de...
- Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:42 am
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Workflows & Standards & good practices
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8676
Re: Workflows & Standards & good practices
Tony and Ahmet, Thanks very much for initiating this discussion. I've read through much of the documents and exchange, and I generally agree with the workflow elements. In my experience of developing and applying a variety of models for varying context of use, I've come up with a series generalized ...
- Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:43 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Workflows & Standards & good practices
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8676
Workflows & Standards & good practices
The following is a discussion initiated by Dr. Anthony Hunt with the CPMS Co-chairs via email as a consequence of the 2015 IMAG Multiscale Modeling Consortium meeting (http://www.imagwiki.nibib.nih.gov/imag-events/2015-msm-consortium-meeting). Given the significance of the discussion to the end goal...
- Wed Aug 12, 2015 10:18 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Funding Opportunity: Computational Models of Muscle Phys.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 480
Funding Opportunity: Computational Models of Muscle Phys.
Dear Colleagues, Please see below for a NASA research funding announcement in computational modeling of muscle physiology. This is a unique opportunity that is typically available once every three to five years. Please carefully follow all of instructions provided in the various appendices/documents...
- Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:47 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Ten Simple Rules Survey Data Analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1002
Ten Simple Rules Survey Data Analysis
This forum thread is intended to facilitate open discussion among the CPMS Data Analysis group in the evaluation of the Ten Simple Rules survey results. The survey was launched on August 15, 2014 and closed on April 16, 2015 (8 months). The results of the survey will be used to identify the "Ten Sim...
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:23 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Survey Data Analysis
- Replies: 0
- Views: 749
Survey Data Analysis
This forum discussion is intended to help the CPMS Data Analysis Group and the rest of the Committee to iron out the details of how the Ten Simple Rules survey will be analyzed to appropriately interpret the results to establish the "Guidelines for Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healt...
- Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:05 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Should “technology” be included in the Committee Charge?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 19940
Re: Should “technology” be included in the Committee Charge?
Dear all, Ahmet and I have reviewed the voting results for the three options, and they are summarized below. Please note that a few people provided their votes via email instead of responding to the forum thread. Vote Results Option 1: Do not add "technology" in Committee charges - 15 Votes Option 2...
- Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:50 pm
- Forum: Credible Practice of Modeling & Simulation in Healthcare
- Topic: Should “technology” be included in the Committee Charge?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 19940
Re: Should “technology” be included in the Committee Charge?
In order for me to better understand the context, can you provide a draft of what Option 2 might look like? Technology is such a broad word. For example, all programs at NIBIB are categorized under technology development; including modeling, analysis and simulation. I personally see it being diffic...