Search found 6 matches
- Tue Sep 03, 2024 10:38 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Implementation of temporary restraints
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1137
Re: Implementation of temporary restraints
Forgive me, I'm trying to make certain I understand the usage of a global parameter. Coming from Gromacs, I'm not intuitively familiar with how these are accessible. I know this is going to be a stupid question and I apologize. If I create a global parameter in the definition of an external force, d...
- Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:13 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Implementation of temporary restraints
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1137
Implementation of temporary restraints
Greetings, I'm an open-mm rookie and I have another question. The system I'm attempting to run is a liquid crystal simulation. The beginning of the simulation requires position restraints on the molecules and restraints on the molecular orientation while the simulation comes to equilibrium. From the...
- Tue Aug 20, 2024 2:04 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6050
Re: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
Forgive me, one additional question I have here. In Gromacs, it's possible to designate any charge freely to an atom in the topology regardless of the underlying nonbonding type. If I were to use nonBondedForce, it seems like I'm restrained to using either the type or the class of the atom as listed...
- Tue Aug 20, 2024 10:27 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6050
Re: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
Ok, this makes sense. I will be using a GPU, so I'll try without doing anything special to see how it works to start with.
Thanks for your help!
Greg
Thanks for your help!
Greg
- Tue Aug 20, 2024 10:08 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6050
Re: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
Ok, thank you! This helps a lot. I have one additional question about the customNonbondedForce objects. If I'm specifying atom directives in the rule for each individual atom, it looks like I need to include my combining rule directly into the form of the potential. The Buckingham potential that I'm...
- Sat Aug 17, 2024 3:00 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6050
Use of CustomNonbondedForce XML for Buckingham
Greetings, I'm an OpenMM rookie and this looks like one of the best places I've found to ask questions about it. I was hoping to make a custom nonbonded force field involving Buckingham potentials and there are a couple things from the documentation that I don't understand. The regular nonbondedforc...