<t>Hello Sherm,<br/> <br/> Very interesting solution you suggest there. This brings a comment and a question:<br/> <br/> Comment:<br/> The documentation, and more specifically the user's guide (section 2.3.1), suggest cutting a *joint* and not a body. It would be a nice addition to change that to th...

I second the motion. Another example is under Vista 64, where the 32 programs are installed under Program Files (x86).

<t>Hello Sherm,<br/> <br/> I am surprised by your answer: is it possible to build from source? Each time I looked at the SVN access, it seems all there is in there is the documentation and some build information, I've never seen any source code. Where can I get the source to build from it? This woul...

They are in my original message, in the P.-.P.-S. section, at the bottom.

Thanks guys,

Hello Peter,

I am linking dynamically and I get the error at link time.

Note that I ran simulations without any problems. It is specifically the realize() call (which has a 2nd default argument of Stage::LastValid or something like that) that is causing problems.

<t> const SimTK::Vec3 PelvisCoM = SimTK::Vec3(-1.76, 5.45, 5.42);<br/> const SimTK::Vec3 PelvisRASIS = SimTK::Vec3(3.76, 8.78, 4.15);<br/> const SimTK::Vec3 PelvisLASIS = SimTK::Vec3(3.76, 8.78, -22.09);<br/> const SimTK::Vec3 PelvisRPSIS = SimTK::Vec3(-11.33,8.58,-4.53);<br/> const SimTK::Vec3 Pelv...

<t>Hello Peter,<br/> <br/> I am trying to implement the method we had discussed here and I am having a hard time doing so.<br/> <br/> I first create some bodies (Body::Rigid) and then mobilizes them (MobilizedBody::Orientation).<br/> <br/> I the realize the topology, get the default state, then appl...

<t>Thanks for underlining this fact.<br/> <br/> There are two different cases of kinematic data:<br/> 1. From position based sensors<br/> 2. From inertial based sensors<br/> <br/> In the first case, I am unsure how it would be done in the "online" solution to be honest. Maybe some numerical differen...

Yes, you are right, this would be an option. ALthough we could also do it using a TimeStepper and an Event Handler, I believe. But I'm not sure there would be a gain.

<t>Thank you very much for your answer Michael.<br/> <br/> It seems I am lucky with my timings and I will be quite happy to answer any questions regarding what we need or hope to have. <br/> <br/> Before I get into our needs, I just want to make sure I understand the two options properly:<br/> <br/>...