Hi all, This is a very interesting discussion. Here are a few comments I don't really feel like I have a 'workflow', but rather than just not reply I thought it might be interesting to really think about why I don't have, or don't feel like I have, a workflow. Some reasons are: * I don't tend to eve...

Having read the discussion, I vote for option 1. I think technology can be taken into account as appropriate without formally being introduced into the Commitee Charge.

For the record, the survey didn't feel long when I tried it, since the statements are short. Some comments about specific questions: > Use appropriate data (input, validation, verification, etc.) > Validate the M&S within context of use > Verify the M&S within context of use How do you know all the ...

If you noticed, I chose only 3 elements from the list. I was trying to get a ranking of all the rules. If every one of us picks only 3 we can quickly rank the best 10. It also makes us think harder what is really more important. I assume you ranked your list according to importance. My ordering was...

Some initial thoughts. From the above list, the ones that stand out to me as being the most important are: Use version control Define the context the model is intended to be used for Attempt verification within context Attempt validation within context -- I would include the rule 'Define your evalua...

This thread is to discuss the proposed 'ten simple rules for credible practice'. See http://wiki.simtk.org/cpms/Ten_Simple_Rules_of_Credible_Practice for more details. A list of possible rules (copied from above link) is: Use version control Use credible solvers Explicitly list your limitations Defi...