We are in the process of uploading a OpenSim v4.x version (read, as in today) that will have a viewable ribcage (among other subtle, but soundly based mods).
Thanks for using our model, and please let us know if you have any questions.
Jake Banks
Search found 88 matches
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:30 am
- Forum: Spine and rib cage model in OpenSim
- Topic: adding the ribs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 332
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:27 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
- Replies: 6
- Views: 817
Re: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
Good deal. Glad to that I could help. FYI: If your using Thelen muscles, consider switching to Millards. In OpenSim >4 the Thelen muscle's lowest activation is .01, while Millard's can go to 0. You'll want to recalculate/find your PEC forces, as the curves are slightly different. You can switch musc...
- Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:08 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
- Replies: 6
- Views: 817
Re: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
I assume you mean 'weld' or 'locked' the shoulder coordinate instead of 'blocked'? If so, a other things to consider then (perhaps in this order): - Inverse Dynamics is just a frame-by-frame (i.e. incremental times) calculation of the joint demands. Even in a very simple single pendulum model (like ...
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 7:50 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
- Replies: 6
- Views: 817
Re: inverse dynamics and passive muscle contribution
Perhaps your signs are flipped... have you tried adding the passive torques instead of subtracting them?
Otherwise, are you also applying a similar method to account for shoulder joint flexion (assuming you have that DoF)? If not, biarticular muscles may be impacting moment arms and passive lengths.
Otherwise, are you also applying a similar method to account for shoulder joint flexion (assuming you have that DoF)? If not, biarticular muscles may be impacting moment arms and passive lengths.
- Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:15 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Prescribed Controller with Static Optimization
- Replies: 4
- Views: 896
Re: Prescribed Controller with Static Optimization
I'm having a very similar issue ( assigning an actuator force and SOpt not considering it ). I've been testing variations of an approach posted a few years ago: https://simtk.org/plugins/phpBB/viewtopicPhpbb.php?f=91&t=6499&p=29752&start=0&view= I don't get any error's, but SOpt simply does not cons...
- Thu Jan 28, 2021 11:52 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Muscle Activation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 668
Re: Muscle Activation
If lowering the actuator's contribution doesn't do the trick, you can always develop an API which considers EMG. For a shameless plug, please see the attached abstract introducing our implementation of Cholewicki's EMG optimization method with opensim + Matlab (we are in the process of submitting a ...
- Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:49 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Static Optimization moments
- Replies: 3
- Views: 536
Re: Static Optimization moments
Thank you very much for the timely response. It helps explain what SOpt is doing, but it still does not explain (to me anyways) the results I am getting. How could my GRFs not be contributing to my SOpt solution? I am getting the same results regardless of applying a GRF or not. I can even make the ...
- Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:40 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: Static Optimization moments
- Replies: 3
- Views: 536
Static Optimization moments
I am looking for some clarity on how SOpt determines the moments it balances. I have read in the documentation and in a previous posts about some of the subtle differences between how the SOpt and Inverse Dynamics moments are calculated, but they do not explain the issue I am having. I am using a mo...