Search found 2546 matches
- Mon Oct 09, 2023 4:08 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenMM 8.1 beta
- Replies: 0
- Views: 414
OpenMM 8.1 beta
The beta of OpenMM 8.1 is now available. You can install it with conda using the command conda install -c conda-forge/label/openmm_rc -c conda-forge openmm This release contains many performance improvements, particularly to the CUDA and OpenCL platforms. The largest speedups are for very large syst...
- Mon Oct 02, 2023 8:34 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1187
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
If you want the particles to be completely immobile, you can just set their masses to zero. That will prevent them from moving at all.
- Thu Sep 28, 2023 12:31 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Benchmark of OpenMM on NVIDIA A10 cards
- Replies: 1
- Views: 266
Re: Benchmark of OpenMM on NVIDIA A10 cards
I don't know of any specific numbers for it, but I'd expect the A10 to be significantly slower than the others.
- Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:22 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: What type of bond determines a molecule in a barostat?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 300
Re: What type of bond determines a molecule in a barostat?
The technical answer is that every Force class (or still more technically, the ForceImpl it creates) defines a getBondedParticles() method. It reports which particles are bonded to each other by that Force. In practice, the Forces that define bonds are HarmonicBondForce, CustomBondForce, CustomCentr...
- Thu Sep 21, 2023 11:58 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1187
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
I modified your script to loop over all platforms and time the force evaluation for each one. import numpy as np import openmm as mm from openmm import app from openmm.unit import angstrom import time positions = np.random.rand(110, 3) * 100*angstrom # define the box size box_size = 100*angstrom # d...
- Thu Sep 21, 2023 11:06 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1187
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
Another issue is your box size. 1000 nm is huge. The cost of PME scales with the size of the box. Do you really intend it to be that big?
- Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:59 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1187
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
What are you timing? The whole script, or just the call to getState()? All the setup is much more expensive than the force evaluation. Creating a Simulation involves a lot of work, but it only has to be done once. The very first call to getState() often also has to do additional initialization. That...
- Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:31 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Regarding addInteractionGroup() in CustomNonBodedForce
- Replies: 1
- Views: 259
Re: Regarding addInteractionGroup() in CustomNonBodedForce
Modifying a System or the Forces it contains has no effect on any Simulations that already exist. You need to make the changes before you create the Simulation. Alternatively you can call simulation.context.reinitialize().
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 8:44 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Multiple CustomNonbondedForce
- Replies: 1
- Views: 314
Re: Multiple CustomNonbondedForce
This error is unrelated to having multiple CustomNonbondedForces. It means a single CustomNonbondedForce has had multiple exclusions added to it for the same pair of particles.
- Fri Aug 18, 2023 2:54 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Potential Energy error at Folding@Home
- Replies: 1
- Views: 331
Re: Potential Energy error at Folding@Home
You need to ask the Folding@home developers about this. I don't think they read this forum.