Search found 2546 matches
- Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:07 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1185
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
Please provide a complete example I can use to reproduce the problem. Otherwise, I don't really know what you're doing or why it isn't working!
- Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:02 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1185
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
Can you provide a complete, working example that demonstrates the problem? The code you posted before doesn't correspond to what you described since it doesn't use a real integrator, doesn't run any dynamics, and never retrieves the positions.
- Thu Jun 27, 2024 7:30 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1185
Re: Python API to evaluate ewald Coulomb force
Is that really what you mean? I don't know what the values in positions are, but unless they're all tiny values on the order of 1e-10, you're setting the positions to huge values.simulation.context.setPositions(positions*1e+10*angstrom)
- Thu Jun 13, 2024 11:44 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenMM Installation Issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 215
Re: OpenMM Installation Issue
The correct command to test it is
Are you looking at an old version of the documentation?
Code: Select all
python -m openmm.testInstallation
- Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:58 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Liquid-Liquid (water-hexane) interfaces workflow issues and setPositions() error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 183
Re: Liquid-Liquid (water-hexane) interfaces workflow issues and setPositions() error
When I load your PDB file, I get a lot of warnings like /Users/peastman/miniconda3/envs/openmm/lib/python3.9/site-packages/openmm/app/internal/pdbstructure.py:537: UserWarning: WARNING: duplicate atom (HETATM 6441 C1 HEXAB9999 4.711 32.046 48.163 1.00 10.00 C , HETATM 6421 C1 HEXAB9999 10.934 22.748...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:16 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Patches when using CHARMM files
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1235
Re: Patches when using CHARMM files
In CHARMM, patches are generally applied at the modelling stage. If you used a patch while generating your PSF file, it should contain everything it needs to be read correctly.
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:18 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: PDB File doesnt properly turn into topology with app.PDBFile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1459
Re: PDB File doesnt properly turn into topology with app.PDBFile
Every atom in a residue is required to have a unique name. Because your atoms are all named either "H" or "C", it assumes they are alternate locations for the same two atoms rather than different atoms.
- Thu Apr 11, 2024 9:11 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenMM benchmark on multiple RTX GPUs?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1243
Re: OpenMM benchmark on multiple RTX GPUs?
No, it does not use tensor cores. We've looked into it, but there isn't really anything they would be useful for. They have a couple of problems. 1. Really all they do is matrix multiplication. They aren't useful for anything that doesn't look like a matrix multiplication. 2. They don't support 32 b...
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:18 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: System stays static after 1M simulation steps
- Replies: 2
- Views: 950
Re: System stays static after 1M simulation steps
What do you expect to happen in that time? Is it a stable molecule or a very flexible one? 1 million steps is 4 ns. How much conformational change do you expect it to undergo in that time?
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:24 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: OpenMM benchmark on multiple RTX GPUs?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1243
Re: OpenMM benchmark on multiple RTX GPUs?
You're better off just using a single GPU. For one thing, 100,000 atoms isn't really that large. It probably doesn't provide enough work to saturate multiple 4090s. For another thing, the performance of multi-GPU simulations depends strongly on the speed of communication between GPUs. All consumer G...