Search found 45 matches
- Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:59 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Attempted Tutorial, got: Particle coordinate is nan
- Replies: 0
- Views: 129
Attempted Tutorial, got: Particle coordinate is nan
Hello, I'm trying to run the script from here: http://openmm.org/tutorials/alchemical-free-energy/ But got "Particle coordinate is nan" while running. Do you know why? Thanks. Here is my version. and I tested with openCL and CPU, both got the error. openmm 7.4.1 py36_cuda101_rc_1 omnia openmmtools 0...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:09 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Could atoms change parameters on the fly?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 200
Re: Could atoms change parameters on the fly?
Can I update the parameter when some condition are met. for example, when two atom are close to each other and their total kinetic energy is larger than certain threshold?
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 4:27 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Could atoms change parameters on the fly?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 200
Could atoms change parameters on the fly?
In CustomNonBonded force, we can specify the parameters for each atoms. But If I want to simulate a possible reaction: when two atoms come close enough, they react to each other, how can I change the parameters after the step the reaction happened. It will be great if OpenMM can support this.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:04 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Single and double precision produce different result
- Replies: 3
- Views: 318
Re: Single and double precision produce different result
I'm using openMM 7.4.1, py36_cuda101_rc_1.
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 12:40 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Single and double precision produce different result
- Replies: 3
- Views: 318
Single and double precision produce different result
Hello Peter, We encounter a strange bug: the single and double precision gives different energy for our CustomHbondForce force. In the attachment is a much simplified code, so you should be able to reproduce easily. (by doing "python simplified_code.py" to use single precision, and "python simplifie...
- Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:53 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Re: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
great advice. I didn't realize I could using addExclusion() to prevent the self interaction. I will test it out. Thanks!
- Mon Jun 29, 2020 4:19 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Re: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
right. It is a coarse grained force field. Only one term for each pair of residues. The function will be pairwise between the CB of all residues.(but modulated by the CB of residues near them in sequence) the term for each pair will be a function depends on r_ij, r_(i+4,j+4) and some parameters wher...
- Mon Jun 29, 2020 3:47 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Re: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
Thanks for the quick reply. It should be a non-bonded force. and it is a pairwise term at its core, so it will be n^2. but with some additional information required. for example, when compute the interaction between residue i and residue j, I want the energy modulated by the distance between the CB ...
- Mon Jun 29, 2020 3:07 pm
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Can we give CustomCompoundBondForce a computation cutoff
Hello, I want to implement a complex potential for coarse grained simulation. The potential is a pairwise function, but requires the positions of four atoms. There is one interaction between each pair of residues. The force is applied to the CB atom of each residues. the interaction of two CB atoms ...
- Wed May 13, 2020 10:57 am
- Forum: OpenMM
- Topic: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
- Replies: 9
- Views: 55073
Re: CustomNonbondedForce with pair dependent constants
Hello Peter, I have a similar problem. but a little more complicate. The potential I want to add is not a LJ potential.(it's defined by tabulated continuous function) so I would hope to have a mixed Discrete-Continuous tabulated function. To be more specific, the input array will be 3D. The first 2 ...