Search found 374 matches
- Tue Nov 07, 2023 3:41 pm
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Range of design variables
- Replies: 3
- Views: 954
Re: Range of design variables
Thanks both! That is a nice new feature.
- Mon Nov 06, 2023 7:17 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Range of design variables
- Replies: 3
- Views: 954
Range of design variables
Hi all, In most simulations that most of us do in Moco, the variables that are optimized (i.e. the "design variables) all vary over a range of approximately [-1, +1], for example muscle excitations, muscle activations, CC lengths, normalized SEC forces, joint angles in radians, etc. In a current sim...
- Wed Oct 25, 2023 4:41 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: I'm curious about RRA
- Replies: 2
- Views: 351
Re: I'm curious about RRA
Hi Soyoung, I would not equate RRA with filtering. There will be non-zero residuals in an inverse dynamics analysis even in a hypothetical situation where the skeletal motion and external forces are measured with perfect accuracy. I recommend the following paper, where the first few paragraphs descr...
- Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:10 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2910
Re: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
For example, this morning I started a simulation of walking with a prosthetic limb that adds a degree of freedom (pistoning) between the residual limb and prosthesis. Previously I've been modeling that interface as rigid. As the initial guess for this simulation, I used a previous simulation with th...
- Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:03 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2910
Re: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
I second Nick's recommendation to start simple and add complexity from there. When I first started using Moco, I started with the "example2Dwalk" example, which runs fast and converges on a good result. Then I gradually made one change at a time to that model and setup, for example first I changed i...
- Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:25 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Final Time Error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 458
Re: Final Time Error
I've never seen this one before but from the reference to "resampling" I'm guessing it's something related to the initial guess. My guess would be it's re-sampling the initial guess and somehow getting a final time in the guess of 1.799999999999... or something, when the problem is specifying a fina...
- Sun Oct 01, 2023 4:21 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Multicore parallel computing with Moco
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3028
Re: Multicore parallel computing with Moco
Sounds like I should see what the return policy is on the 12-core CPU / 30-core GPU I just bought.
- Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:34 am
- Forum: OpenSim
- Topic: c3dexport.m and filtering
- Replies: 1
- Views: 432
c3dexport.m and filtering
Hi all, I've been using the Matlab script "c3dexport.m" to convert C3D files into TRC and MOT files for AddBiomechanics. Is there a way to replace the data in the osimC3D variable (it's named "c3d" in the code below) with modified data, before writing the data to the TRC and MOT files? Filtering/smo...
- Tue Jul 11, 2023 4:27 am
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Joint Reaction Analysis
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4402
Re: Joint Reaction Analysis
Hi Nick, I would use whatever speed the subject(s) in the tracking target data walked at, but I also doubt that an inconsistency there is the source of the hip JCF issue. Various questions below: - What does the overall tracking result look like? Is it tracking the target data fairly well? - What ar...
- Fri Jun 30, 2023 4:23 pm
- Forum: OpenSim Moco
- Topic: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2910
Re: Ground Reaction Forces after MocoContactTracking
Hi Christian, A couple things to try/consider: (1) Try turning the tracking weight on the GRF way high and seeing if the solution then has good tracking of them. This will most likely come at the cost of other terms in the cost function, but it can help with identifying the issue. (2) From the image...