Non-optimal GB parameters

The functionality of OpenMM will (eventually) include everything that one would need to run modern molecular simulation.
POST REPLY
User avatar
Aron Broom
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:33 am

Non-optimal GB parameters

Post by Aron Broom » Sat Sep 29, 2018 2:24 pm

Hi All,

I'm getting a user warning about non-optimal GB parameters when trying to run an implicit solvent simulation from LEaP inputs. Based on the code generating the warning this is because of an apparent mismatch between the radii and the screening terms.

Specifically, I'm selecting the "GBn2" model in OpenMM, and my LEaP inputs were generated by first setting the correct radii using: "set default PBRadii mbondi3" as indicated in the AMBER manual.

So as far as I can tell everything should match up.

I tried modifying the code in the amber_file_parser.py to take the screening terms from the prmtop even when using the GBn2 model and not just for the HCT and OBC models, but the same warning appears.

Has anyone else seen this? Is this an issue with generating the inputs using LEaP instead of loading the AMBER FF using OpenMM itself?

Thanks,

Aron

User avatar
Peter Eastman
Posts: 2593
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:25 pm

Re: Non-optimal GB parameters

Post by Peter Eastman » Thu Oct 04, 2018 2:58 pm

I think you can ignore that warning. It's checking for the mbondi2 radii. Let me check with the person who originally wrote that code to be sure.

User avatar
Aron Broom
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:33 am

Re: Non-optimal GB parameters

Post by Aron Broom » Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:58 pm

OK thanks.

The simulation qualitatively looks OK, nothing bizarre happening.

POST REPLY