Page 1 of 1
Allowed force fields in GPU-GROMACS?
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:29 pm
by vijaysingh
Hi,
I am using a 64 bit linux cuda system with the latest version of Gromacs.
Q1) Are all the force fields presented by pdb2gmx available to be incorporated on the gpu-gromacs?
0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
1: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
2: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
3: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
4: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
5: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
6: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field (see manual)
7: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field with hydrogens for NMR
8: Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
9: Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
Q2) I seem to be having trouble with the energy file, in that the file (*.edr) remains empty. Any reasons why that could be happening?
Thanks,
VJ
RE: Allowed force fields in GPU-GROMACS?
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:45 pm
by peastman
> Q1) Are all the force fields presented by pdb2gmx available to be incorporated on the gpu-gromacs?
No, some of them use functional forms that aren't supported by OpenMM. The only force field that is *fully* supported is AMBER, which you can get from
http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/
OPLS is *almost* fully supported. The only problem is that OpenMM uses Lorentz-Bertelot combining rules for Lennard-Jones interactions, not the Jorgensen combining rules that OPLS calls for. This will make a slight (but probably very small) difference in your results.
> Q2) I seem to be having trouble with the energy file, in that the file (*.edr) remains empty. Any reasons why that could be happening?
Make sure you're using PR4, since earlier releases didn't output energies. In PR4 the following energy terms should be reported correctly: potential energy, kinetic energy, total energy, and temperature. All other values in the edr file will be zero.
Peter
RE: Allowed force fields in GPU-GROMACS?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:37 am
by vijaysingh
Thanks Peter,
We are working on the force field porting and hope to be completed with it shortly.
For the energy, I am using PR4, but may be I should double check my flag settings.
Thanks Again,
VJ