Currently the only way I know how to simulate organic non-standard molecules is to use AMBER to make the inpcrd and prmtop with a box of explicit solvent.
Anyway to solvate them implicitly?
Thanks! -Jonathan
Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
- Jonathan Saboury
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:48 am
- Peter Eastman
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:25 pm
Re: Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
I'm not familiar with implicit models for any solvents other than water. That's not to say there aren't any, just that it's not a subject I'm familiar with. Perhaps someone else will know something.
Peter
Peter
- Jonathan Saboury
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:48 am
Re: Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
Hi Peter, sorry for not being clear on this, i meant implicit water.
In amber you only can create a Born implicit water model with sander during the simulation process, which is not included in the free ambertools12.
What I need to do is load the inpcrd and prmtop files into OpenMM and have it run implicit water with a cutoff somehow.
Thanks, Jonathan
In amber you only can create a Born implicit water model with sander during the simulation process, which is not included in the free ambertools12.
What I need to do is load the inpcrd and prmtop files into OpenMM and have it run implicit water with a cutoff somehow.
Thanks, Jonathan
- Peter Eastman
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:25 pm
Re: Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
Just specify the implicit solvent model and cutoff when you call createSystem(). For example, prmtop.createSystem(implicitSolvent=OBC2, nonbondedCutoff=2*nanometers). See section 4.3.3 of the user guide.
Peter
Peter
- Jonathan Saboury
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:49 am
Re: Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
Thank you for the reply, should have done more homework.
Made my simulations run 400x faster now and the results look good!!
Thank you so much!
Made my simulations run 400x faster now and the results look good!!
Thank you so much!
- Peter Eastman
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:25 pm
Re: Support for implicit water for organic molecules?
We'll see if we can get it up to 401x in the next release.
Peter
Peter