Thelen2003Muscle vs. Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
John Rogers
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:47 am

Thelen2003Muscle vs. Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated

Post by John Rogers » Thu Jun 12, 2014 12:05 pm

What is the difference between these two?

Why can't I find max_contraction_velocity in Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated.

Thanks
John

User avatar
jimmy d
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:51 pm

Re: Thelen2003Muscle vs. Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated

Post by jimmy d » Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:16 am

Hi John,

Deprecated types are those we don't support anymore either because they are redundant or their implementation was incorrect. The Thelen2003muscle_Deprecated inherited the properties from activation_fibre_length_deprecated, which doesn't include max_contraction_velocity. The current Thelen2003muscle inherits from an updated version of activation_fibre_length, which does include max_contraction_velocity.

In this case, you would have to update to the current muscle model to access this property.

Hope that helps?
-james

User avatar
John Rogers
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Thelen2003Muscle vs. Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated

Post by John Rogers » Fri Jun 20, 2014 9:02 am

Thanks James.
I understand from your post that Thelen2003Muscle is more recent than the Deprecated version.
Someone advised me to use the deprecated version for a project (a project based on Sam Hamner's models), and now I am wondering why.
In what case might you want to use an old version of the muscle?
Thanks
John

User avatar
jimmy d
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:51 pm

Re: Thelen2003Muscle vs. Thelen2003Muscle_Deprecated

Post by jimmy d » Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:26 am

Hi John,

The only case in which you would use the old versions is if you wanted to replicate previous results.

-james

POST REPLY