Different results when downsampling activation data

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
blake harper
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:18 pm

Different results when downsampling activation data

Post by blake harper » Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:03 pm

Hello,

I am using measured muscle activation (calculated from EMG) and kinematics to calculate torques using the analyze tool. The original EMG data was measured at a sampling frequency of 200 Hz. I have run the analyze tool with activation at the full sampling frequency as well as downsampled versions of the same activation data. The torque results from the analyze tool vary greatly depending on the sampling frequency (see solid lines on attached torque plots) even though I can't see a noticeable difference in the actual activation when I downsample (see attached downsampled activation).

Has anyone ever encountered this change in results when downsampling data? Is there a minimum sampling frequency that should be used for activation or another reason why this might be happening?
Attachments
downsampled activation.jpg
downsampled activation.jpg (133.12 KiB) Viewed 122 times
200 Hz.jpg
200 Hz.jpg (66.48 KiB) Viewed 122 times
100 Hz.jpg
100 Hz.jpg (65.48 KiB) Viewed 122 times
50 Hz.jpg
50 Hz.jpg (62.98 KiB) Viewed 122 times
20 Hz.jpg
20 Hz.jpg (59.24 KiB) Viewed 122 times

Tags:

POST REPLY