Scaling results - Evaluation
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 1:09 am
Hi,
I performed Scaling with the MoBL_ARMS model using marker data from experiments. I read the page https://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu/d ... th+Scaling which explains results evaluation. It is written that the maximum marker error should be lower than 2cm and the RMS should be lower than 1cm. In my experiments there is the static pose missing. Therefore, I have to take a single frame from the motion file for scaling. In my scaling results I have maximum errors lower than 4cm and RMS lower than 3cm. I already adjusted the marker weights. Do you think there is anything more to do to improve my results or is it normal that I get larger errors since my static pose is missing?
Furthermore, on the page https://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu/d ... th+Scaling is written that one should adjust the virtual markers of the scaled model to match the experimental markers. Why is this the case?
Thank you very much.
Pia
I performed Scaling with the MoBL_ARMS model using marker data from experiments. I read the page https://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu/d ... th+Scaling which explains results evaluation. It is written that the maximum marker error should be lower than 2cm and the RMS should be lower than 1cm. In my experiments there is the static pose missing. Therefore, I have to take a single frame from the motion file for scaling. In my scaling results I have maximum errors lower than 4cm and RMS lower than 3cm. I already adjusted the marker weights. Do you think there is anything more to do to improve my results or is it normal that I get larger errors since my static pose is missing?
Furthermore, on the page https://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu/d ... th+Scaling is written that one should adjust the virtual markers of the scaled model to match the experimental markers. Why is this the case?
Thank you very much.
Pia