Inverse Dynamic Problem
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 5:28 am
Hello
I'm settung up a model to analyze mocap marker trajectories and ground reaction forces and moments. My goal is to perform inverse dynamics and calculate joint power and work. I would also like to estimate muscle forces using e.g. static optimization. The motion I'm analyzing is running.
I have used the "lee-sonstoolbox" to transform marker trajectories from my lab orientation to the reference frame used in the model called "leg39" that is available in the model repository. The toolbox didn't work to extract GRF&Ms from the .csv file, and i have therefore exported the .mot file from Vicon Nexus.
I think i have solved the kinematics correctly. I have RMS errors for the markers at 0.0319, and the pose of the model looks correct.
The inverse dynamic results on the other hand looks completely off comparing the results i have calculated using other musculoskeletal softwares. Looking at the raw data in the .mot file from Vicon, GRF&Ms look correct. I have attached the joint angels, moments and pelvis forces in plots. I would assume the pelvis forces should be around 0 and they should only be active to take up small residuals to maintain equilibrium for the analysis solved bottom-up.
I hope one of you guys can help
Cheers
Frederik
I'm settung up a model to analyze mocap marker trajectories and ground reaction forces and moments. My goal is to perform inverse dynamics and calculate joint power and work. I would also like to estimate muscle forces using e.g. static optimization. The motion I'm analyzing is running.
I have used the "lee-sonstoolbox" to transform marker trajectories from my lab orientation to the reference frame used in the model called "leg39" that is available in the model repository. The toolbox didn't work to extract GRF&Ms from the .csv file, and i have therefore exported the .mot file from Vicon Nexus.
I think i have solved the kinematics correctly. I have RMS errors for the markers at 0.0319, and the pose of the model looks correct.
The inverse dynamic results on the other hand looks completely off comparing the results i have calculated using other musculoskeletal softwares. Looking at the raw data in the .mot file from Vicon, GRF&Ms look correct. I have attached the joint angels, moments and pelvis forces in plots. I would assume the pelvis forces should be around 0 and they should only be active to take up small residuals to maintain equilibrium for the analysis solved bottom-up.
I hope one of you guys can help
Cheers
Frederik