There is a significant difference in the analysis results obtained using DeGrooteFregle2016Muscle and Millard2012Equilib

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
Jingke Song
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:52 am

There is a significant difference in the analysis results obtained using DeGrooteFregle2016Muscle and Millard2012Equilib

Post by Jingke Song » Sun Apr 09, 2023 8:06 am

Why do I have significant differences in the analysis results obtained using DeGrooteFregle2016Muscle and Millard2012EquilibriumMuscle under the same muscle parameters. When analyzing muscle metabolism results, although their trends are almost consistent, their amplitudes are not on the same order of magnitude. When analyzing muscle force, there are also significant differences in the magnitude of muscle force, but within the same order of magnitude and with the same trend, it can be reluctantly accepted.

Tags:

User avatar
Jingke Song
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:52 am

Re: There is a significant difference in the analysis results obtained using DeGrooteFregle2016Muscle and Millard2012Equ

Post by Jingke Song » Thu Apr 13, 2023 11:31 pm

Sorry, I need to retract my issue. The problem I experienced was caused by incorrect simulation parameter settings. After modification, the analysis results obtained from these two types of muscles are basically consistent.

POST REPLY