Model Scaling for OpenSense
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:48 am
Dear OpenSim and OpenSense developers and users,
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to address a query from a collaborator regarding the necessity of scaling models for use in OpenSense, specifically concerning inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics analyses.
Our current understanding suggests that for inverse kinematics, which involves deriving joint angles, scaling is not required since IMUs provide orientation data directly. This perspective is supported by the documentation available https://opensimconfluence.atlassian.net ... h+IMU+Data, which indicates that model scaling is not necessary for calculating joint angles or conducting other kinematic analyses.
However, there appears to be a contrasting viewpoint presented in a recent video discussion, particularly concerning scaling for CP children, accessible https://youtu.be/ewuvpB2QUf8?feature=shared. It seems there may be some confusion, as the presenters might be referring to the necessity of scaling for analyses that extend beyond kinematic analyses.
Given these discrepancies, it would be greatly beneficial to our community to clarify the following points:
1) Does OpenSense require or perform any scaling for sensor placement or the calculation of joint angles? Additionally, what about analyses that go beyond kinematics, such as inverse dynamics?
2) How does scaling impact the animation of the model using inverse kinematics results?
Your insights and clarifications on these matters would be greatly appreciated to enhance our collective understanding and application of OpenSense.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Mohammad Shourijeh
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to address a query from a collaborator regarding the necessity of scaling models for use in OpenSense, specifically concerning inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics analyses.
Our current understanding suggests that for inverse kinematics, which involves deriving joint angles, scaling is not required since IMUs provide orientation data directly. This perspective is supported by the documentation available https://opensimconfluence.atlassian.net ... h+IMU+Data, which indicates that model scaling is not necessary for calculating joint angles or conducting other kinematic analyses.
However, there appears to be a contrasting viewpoint presented in a recent video discussion, particularly concerning scaling for CP children, accessible https://youtu.be/ewuvpB2QUf8?feature=shared. It seems there may be some confusion, as the presenters might be referring to the necessity of scaling for analyses that extend beyond kinematic analyses.
Given these discrepancies, it would be greatly beneficial to our community to clarify the following points:
1) Does OpenSense require or perform any scaling for sensor placement or the calculation of joint angles? Additionally, what about analyses that go beyond kinematics, such as inverse dynamics?
2) How does scaling impact the animation of the model using inverse kinematics results?
Your insights and clarifications on these matters would be greatly appreciated to enhance our collective understanding and application of OpenSense.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Mohammad Shourijeh