Does BushingForce have bug?
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:37 am
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a bug or not.
This is my OSIM file to define a BushingForce in Arm26.osim
.
.
<BushingForce name = "DirectionY">
<isDisabled> False </isDisabled>
<body_1> ground </body_1>
<body_2> r_ulna_radius_hand </body_2>
<location_body_1> (0 0 0) </location_body_1>
<orientation_body_1> (0 0 0) </orientation_body_1>
<location_body_2>(-0.00110000 -0.23559000 0.09430000)</location_body_2>
<orientation_body_2>(0 0 0)</orientation_body_2>
<rotational_stiffness>(0 0 0)</rotational_stiffness>
<translational_stiffness>(0 100 0)</translational_stiffness>
<rotational_damping>(0 0 0)</rotational_damping> <translational_damping>(0 0 0)</translational_damping>
</BushingForce>
.
.
so it has only transitional stiffness in Y direction. But When I use "property viewer"in GUI it shows this as transitional stiffness (100 0 0). in puts 100 in X direction in stead of Y. It also changes the location on body 2.
I am not sure if it is a bug, or I do not know how to use bushing force.
Regards,
Sina
I am not sure if this is a bug or not.
This is my OSIM file to define a BushingForce in Arm26.osim
.
.
<BushingForce name = "DirectionY">
<isDisabled> False </isDisabled>
<body_1> ground </body_1>
<body_2> r_ulna_radius_hand </body_2>
<location_body_1> (0 0 0) </location_body_1>
<orientation_body_1> (0 0 0) </orientation_body_1>
<location_body_2>(-0.00110000 -0.23559000 0.09430000)</location_body_2>
<orientation_body_2>(0 0 0)</orientation_body_2>
<rotational_stiffness>(0 0 0)</rotational_stiffness>
<translational_stiffness>(0 100 0)</translational_stiffness>
<rotational_damping>(0 0 0)</rotational_damping> <translational_damping>(0 0 0)</translational_damping>
</BushingForce>
.
.
so it has only transitional stiffness in Y direction. But When I use "property viewer"in GUI it shows this as transitional stiffness (100 0 0). in puts 100 in X direction in stead of Y. It also changes the location on body 2.
I am not sure if it is a bug, or I do not know how to use bushing force.
Regards,
Sina