My question is twofold.
First, I find the the SO tool having multiple constraint violations at one time step to be very odd. I have not seen this issue in other forum posts. Why so many constraint violations at one time step? what would cause this be happening?
Second, How would I go about resolving the issue? I have run out of trouble shooting options.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Below is the error message displayed in my Opensim Messages Window. Note, what you are seeing is for one timestep only, but I am getting the same error message at nearly all the time steps.
"SimTK Exception thrown at InteriorPointOptimizer.cpp:264:
Optimizer failed: Ipopt: Maximum iterations exceeded (status -1)
OPTIMIZATION FAILED...
StaticOptimization.record: WARN- The optimizer could not find a solution at time = 0.95
The model appears unsuitable for static optimization.
Try appending the model with additional force(s) or locking joint(s) to reduce the following acceleration constraint violation(s):
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -3.0928
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -2.06994
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -9.44128
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 0.01346
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 0.0203893
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -0.072296
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -4.04315
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -0.362868
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -0.334183
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 7.85205
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 0.122539
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 1.02935
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -6.33601
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -1.23671
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -4.43567
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -3.69437
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 1.02789
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 5.74681
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 93.5095
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -6.5003
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -7.23235
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = -4.56863
pelvis_tilt: constraint violation = 19.8178
time = 0.95 Performance = 1.06024 Constraint violation = 97.6914"
Also, attached are the plots of the initial raw kinematic data and the smoothed kinematic data. please take a look at the attached files. It appears to me that the smoothing spline function in matlab did a good job of addressing the noise in the data. Does the smoothed data look sufficient for the SO tool? Do you think the kinematic data could still be the issue?
Thanks in advance for the help!
Colin Holtkamp