Is GRF-option needed for Analysis tool with CMC state data?

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
Hide Kimpara
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:12 am

Is GRF-option needed for Analysis tool with CMC state data?

Post by Hide Kimpara » Sat Jun 06, 2020 8:44 am

Hello,

I'm wondering to add GRF option on Analysis tool. I proceeded RMA and CMC analysis for some gate analysis with GRF data. During RMA and CMC analysis, I always added GRF data. However, should I add GRF data during Analysis tool? CMC state data was selected as a motion data on Analysis tool. Of course, the results of joint reaction forces are different with or without GRF data. Which is the realistic analysis for joint reaction force or reaction forces?

Best regards,
Hide

Tags:

User avatar
Carmichael Ong
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:50 am

Re: Is GRF-option needed for Analysis tool with CMC state data?

Post by Carmichael Ong » Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:59 pm

I believe that if you want to analyze afterwards with the Analyze Tool that you should add the same external forces as you did in CMC to get correct results.

POST REPLY