some transient sink during static optimization

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
ashely yu
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:10 pm

some transient sink during static optimization

Post by ashely yu » Tue Sep 03, 2019 6:49 am

Hi,there.I was head-scratch in this question for months.
The situation is probably like this, based on ToyDroplanding Model I built a model. I adjusted the initial strange posture of the initial model to a sitting position, then add the chair model into it, and added the contact ball and contact force between the chair and the person.(as the following pictures)
ImageImageImageImage

Finishing buliding the model, I creat a rough motion file by myself to test. the motion is lifting the legs when siting.(as the following pictures)
Image
the motion file is as shown

Code: Select all

lifting slow				
version=1				
nRows=121				
nColumns=3				
inDegrees=yes				
				
"Units are S.I. units (second, meters, Newtons, ...)"				
Angles are in degrees.				
				
endheader				
time hip_flexion_r knee_angle_r 
0		90	-90
0.05	90	-90
0.1		90	-90
0.15	90	-90
0.2		90	-90
0.25	90	-90
0.3		90	-90
0.35	90	-90
0.4		90	-90
0.45	90	-90
0.5		90	-90
0.55	90	-90
0.6		90	-90
0.65	90	-90
0.7		90	-90
0.75	90	-90
0.8		90	-90
0.85	90	-90
0.9		90	-90
0.95	90	-90
1		90	-90
1.05	90.25	-90.25
1.1		90.5	-90.5
1.15	90.75	-90.75
1.2	91	-91
1.25	91.25	-91.25
1.3		91.5	-91.5
1.35	91.75	-91.75
1.4		92	-92
1.45	92.25	-92.25
1.5		92.5	-92.5
1.55	92.75	-92.75
1.6		93	-93
1.65	93.25	-93.25
1.7		93.5	-93.5
1.75	93.75	-93.75
1.8		94	-94
1.85	94.25	-94.25
1.9		94.5	-94.5
1.95	94.75	-94.75
2		95	-95
2.05	95.25	-95.25
2.1		95.5	-95.5
2.15	95.75	-95.75
2.2		96	-96
2.25	96.25	-96.25
2.3		96.5	-96.5
2.35	96.75	-96.75
2.4		97	-97
2.45	97.25	-97.25
2.5		97.5	-97.5
2.55	97.75	-97.75
2.6		98	-98
2.65	98.25	-98.25
2.7		98.5	-98.5
2.75	98.75	-98.75
2.8		99	-99
2.85	99.25	-99.25
2.9		99.5	-99.5
2.95	99.75	-99.75
3		100	-100
3.05	100.25	-100.25
3.1		100.5	-100.5
3.15	100.75	-100.75
3.2		101	-101
3.25	101.25	-101.25
3.3		101.5	-101.5
3.35	101.75	-101.75
3.4		102	-102
3.45	102.25	-102.25
3.5		102.5	-102.5
3.55	102.75	-102.75
3.6		103	-103
3.65	103.25	-103.25
3.7		103.5	-103.5
3.75	103.75	-103.75
3.8		104	-104
3.85	104.25	-104.25
3.9		104.5	-104.5
3.95	104.75	-104.75
4		105	-105
4.05	105.25	-105.25
4.1		105.5	-105.5
4.15	105.75	-105.75
4.2		106	-106
4.25	106.25	-106.25
4.3		106.5	-106.5
4.35	106.75	-106.75
4.4		107	-107
4.45	107.25	-107.25
4.5		107.5	-107.5
4.55	107.75	-107.75
4.6		108	-108
4.65	108.25	-108.25
4.7		108.5	-108.5
4.75	108.75	-108.75
4.8		109	-109
4.85	109.25	-109.25
4.9		109.5	-109.5
4.95	109.75	-109.75
5		110	-110
5.05	110.25	-110.25
5.1		110.5	-110.5
5.15	110.75	-110.75
5.2		111	-111
5.25	111.25	-111.25
5.3		111.5	-111.5
5.35	111.75	-111.75
5.4		112	-112
5.45	112.25	-112.25
5.5		112.5	-112.5
5.55	112.75	-112.75
5.6		113	-113
5.65	113.25	-113.25
5.7		113.5	-113.5
5.75	113.75	-113.75
5.8		114	-114
5.85	114.25	-114.25
5.9		114.5	-114.5
5.95	114.75	-114.75
6		115	-115
As I click the simulate button,the model will not pass through, It seems the model is motionless.However, when static optimization is runing,the model change it's post.Also, I remembered save the sitting as the default poses.

So, my question is why the model change it post as the beginning of Static Optimization, and what should I check for my work?

Thank you if anyone can help or suggest.

User avatar
Dimitar Stanev
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:14 am

Re: some transient sink during static optimization

Post by Dimitar Stanev » Tue Sep 03, 2019 1:41 pm

Maybe, the state of the model during static optimization does not use the default values of the coordinates. Try adding the rest of the columns in your .mot file.

POST REPLY