Solution for ball grasp

Provide easy-to-use, extensible software for modeling, simulating, controlling, and analyzing the neuromusculoskeletal system.
POST REPLY
User avatar
Krishnakumar Sankar
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:06 am

Solution for ball grasp

Post by Krishnakumar Sankar » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:51 pm

Hi,
I created a .mot file for ball grasp activity and obtained the net forces and torques of the joint.Now I need to obtain the forces of tendons associated with the motion.Any possible solution would be of great help.

User avatar
Dimitar Stanev
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:14 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Dimitar Stanev » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:35 am

You can perform Static Optimization.

http://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:80 ... timization

User avatar
Krishnakumar Sankar
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:06 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Krishnakumar Sankar » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:17 pm

Thanks a lot sir.Now I am able to obtain individual tendon forces.
I have a couple of questions if you could kindly answer

I uploaded the .mot file that I created using analyze tool and through force reporter i got forces exerted by tendons.Through static optimization I got tendon force values by uploading my .mot file I created .Among these two (analyze tool and static optimization) which one I should follow sir.Also I am uploading the motion file i created.In this file data are given in such a way that a finger grasps the ball in the hand.Possible solutions for the above query sir would be of great help.
Motion.JPG
Motion.JPG (38.66 KiB) Viewed 420 times

User avatar
Dimitar Stanev
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:14 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Dimitar Stanev » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:21 pm

They are identical if your setup is the same. Use Static Optimization.

User avatar
Krishnakumar Sankar
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:06 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Krishnakumar Sankar » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:04 am

Thank you sir.It helped a lot.

The force value of EDCM tendon (maximum 39 N ) obtained through static optimization varies largely with the graph generated through plot (close to 300 N) which I did between active fiber force and .mot file which contains the angle.Could you kindly help me out in comprehending this difference.
Graph.JPG
Graph.JPG (43.95 KiB) Viewed 376 times

User avatar
Krishnakumar Sankar
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:06 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Krishnakumar Sankar » Wed Nov 02, 2016 2:02 am

mitkof6 wrote:They are identical if your setup is the same. Use Static Optimization.
Could you mention what you meant by setup here.All I have is motion file that I created.

Also is there any relation to convert muscle excitation voltage to angle ?.

User avatar
Dimitar Stanev
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:14 am

Re: Solution for ball grasp

Post by Dimitar Stanev » Wed Nov 02, 2016 2:25 am

You used two tools. If you setup the tools correctly their results should be identical. There are some extra options in the AnalysisTool that you should be careful, e.g. step_interval.

http://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:80 ... lysis+Tool

POST REPLY