Collaborators Meeting
Date: Dec 5, 2023
Time: 4:00 PM US/Eastern
Means: MS Teams
Attendees:
- Jason Halloran (WSU)
- Carl Imhauser (HSS)
- Kevin Shelburne (DU)
- Peter Laz (DU)
- Thor Besier (ABI)
- Ahmet Erdemir (CC)
- Snehal Chokhandre (CC)
Agenda:
- Discuss pendign tasks for Kneehub parent grant
- Discuss Manual literature search for Kneehub 2.0
- Discuss Pending administrative tasks
- Other
Immediate Action Items:
- Jason
- Resend reuse case specifications to Snehal
- Start working on reuse case demonstration
- Provide a link to the source material for the literature review article
- Carl
- Reach out to Shady to start working on reuse case demonstration
- Provide a link to the source material for the ORS workshop article
- Thor A and Kevin
- Provide a link to the source material for the model calibration article
- Thor
- Provide a link to the source material for articles on model development and Comparison of bone and cartilage meshes
- Snehal
- Continue the deep literature review
- Send 5 articles to Jason and Pete for quality check
Notes:
- The group discussed pending responsibilities for Kneehub parent grant and tasks were assigned.
- In order to plan the Delphi study / surveys and to potentially structure automated literature search to identify common contexts of use, Snehal has been working on manual deep literature search. She explored various databases and metadata services such as Pubmed, Elicit, Dimensions etc. and decided to use four services (Dimensions, Pubmed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar) to start the search. The goal is to use a combination of keywords in each service and select the first 10 articles based on ‘relevance’. She used seven combinations of keywords in each of the services to obtain a list of 280 articles. She has started extracting information from these articles to potentially identify patterns and common contexts (mechanical or clinical). The following information is extracted – whether the focus of knee computational modeling is a joint (TF/PF) or a tissue, metric or predicted outcome, clinical question/ purpose, loading, pathology/injury and intervention (if any). She has reviewed 40 articles so far and will continue to review the rest in the upcoming weeks.
- Currently, there is no interest in CMBBE workshop. Some members may attend.