Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2018-06-12 19:00:24 →
Size: 3181
Editor: ricimorrill1
Comment:
← Revision 2 as of 2018-06-15 13:11:14 → ⇥
Size: 3422
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
 1. Review of immediate action items from past meeting.  1. Review of action items from past meeting.
Line 30: Line 30:
 1. Decide immediate action items for next meeting.  1. Decide action items for next meeting.
Line 35: Line 35:
  * Update Wiki with final (cleaned-up) surgical tools protocol - add details for each trial
   * Revise/re-work manuscript on instrumented ultrasound
 * Ben
  * Integrate skin extrusion model into Abaqus
  * Look into Sofa models with skin extrusion		   * Update wiki page on surgical tools protocol by adding details for each trial.
   * Revise/re-work manuscript on instrumented ultrasound.
 *Ben
  * Integrate skin extrusion model into Abaqus.
  * Look into Sofa models with skin extrusion.
Line 44: Line 44:
  * Determine how we want to morph the models.   * Determine strategies for model morphing.
Line 51: Line 51:
  * No updates   * Nothing to report.
Line 53: Line 53:
  * No updates from Tod. Rici will reach out to him via e-mail.   * The Cleveland Clinic team did not receive any updates from Tod. Rici will reach out to him via e-mail.
Line 55: Line 55:
  * Wet mock was performed last week.
   * Tyler showed a video of the 3D strain measurement results for indentation. The results are good and methods will be used for final specificiations.
    * Several bugs were found during the mock and we are working with Robb and Tara to fix the remaining bugs.
      * Delayed Optotrak data collection between the first and second data point
      * Specify the range that the angles are presented in (-180 to 180 or 0 to 360 degrees)
      * Vic3D signal was not being sent (FIXED)
   * Ahmet reviewed the order of the trials. Tyler will add details to quantify what is performed in each trial.
     * Tyler asked Ahmet about the dissection trials and if they are necessary. Ahmet suggested that we attempt to collect the data for interface mechanics, but note difficulties or protocol deviations as needed. 		  * A wet mock was performed last week to confirm the whole testing procedure for characterization of surgical tools.
  * Tyler showed a video of the 3D strain measurement results for indentation. The results are good and the methods will be used as part of the final specifications.
  * Several bugs were found during the mock and we are working with Robb and Tara to fix the remaining bugs.
   * There is a delay in Optotrak data collection between the first and second data point.
   * It is desirable to specify the range of reported angles to be between -180 to 180 or 0 to 360 degrees
   * Triggering and synchronization signal to Vic3D signal was not being sent. This issue was later fixed.
  * Ahmet reviewed the order of the trials. Tyler will add details to describe what is performed in each trial.
  * Tyler asked Ahmet about the necessity of dissection trials, e.g. separating skin from fat and fat from muscle. Ahmet suggested to collect the data for interface mechanics, but noted difficulties and the possibility of protocol deviations as needed.
Line 64: Line 64:
  * Ben is working to incorporate the extruded skin model into Abaqus model. Element faces are different between Salome and Abaqus and so he is working to convert them correctly to the Abaqus format.
  * Ahmet also asked Ben to look at where we are at with Sofa, but he has not had time to look into this yet.
  * Ahmet suggested having Sean work on checking the new version of FEBio for in situ strain validity. Ben will advise him as necessary. 		  * Ben has been working to incorporate the extruded skin model into Abaqus. Element face numbering are different between Salome and Abaqus; he is working to convert them correctly to the Abaqus format.
  * Ahmet previously asked Ben to look at where we are at with Sofa. He has not had time to look into this yet.
  * Ahmet suggested having Sean, new engineering recruit, work on checking the new version of FEBio for in situ strain validity. Ben will advise him as necessary.
Line 68: Line 68:
 1. Review of immediate action items from past meeting.  1. Review of action items from past meeting.
Line 70: Line 70:
 1. Decide immediate action items for next meeting.  1. Decide action items for next meeting.
Line 73: Line 73:
  * None Noted   * None noted.

Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic Core Team

Date: June 12, 2018

Time: 2:00 PM EST

Means: In person meeting

Attendees:

  1. Ahmet Erdemir
  2. Rici Neumann
  3. Tyler Schimmoeller
  4. Ariel Schwartz
  5. Ben Landis
  6. Tammy Owings

Agenda:

  1. Manuscripts update.
  2. Data dissemination update.
  3. In vitro testing status.

  4. Modeling & simulation status.

  5. Review of action items from past meeting.
  6. Decide action items for next meeting.
  7. Other.

Ongoing Action Items:

  • Tyler
    • Update wiki page on surgical tools protocol by adding details for each trial.
      • Revise/re-work manuscript on instrumented ultrasound.
  • Ben
    • Integrate skin extrusion model into Abaqus.
    • Look into Sofa models with skin extrusion.
  • Rici
    • Continue development of manuscript on in vivo indentation stiffness.
    • Continue development of manuscript on tissue thickness measurement comparisons.
  • Ahmet
    • Determine strategies for model morphing.
    • Compile haptics libraries and SofaHAPI.
    • Review draft of model assembly manuscript.

Notes:

  1. Manuscripts update.
    • Nothing to report.
  2. Data dissemination update.
    • The Cleveland Clinic team did not receive any updates from Tod. Rici will reach out to him via e-mail.
  3. In vitro testing status.
    • A wet mock was performed last week to confirm the whole testing procedure for characterization of surgical tools.
    • Tyler showed a video of the 3D strain measurement results for indentation. The results are good and the methods will be used as part of the final specifications.
    • Several bugs were found during the mock and we are working with Robb and Tara to fix the remaining bugs.
      • There is a delay in Optotrak data collection between the first and second data point.
      • It is desirable to specify the range of reported angles to be between -180 to 180 or 0 to 360 degrees
      • Triggering and synchronization signal to Vic3D signal was not being sent. This issue was later fixed.
    • Ahmet reviewed the order of the trials. Tyler will add details to describe what is performed in each trial.
    • Tyler asked Ahmet about the necessity of dissection trials, e.g. separating skin from fat and fat from muscle. Ahmet suggested to collect the data for interface mechanics, but noted difficulties and the possibility of protocol deviations as needed.

  4. Modeling & simulation status.

    • Ben has been working to incorporate the extruded skin model into Abaqus. Element face numbering are different between Salome and Abaqus; he is working to convert them correctly to the Abaqus format.
    • Ahmet previously asked Ben to look at where we are at with Sofa. He has not had time to look into this yet.
    • Ahmet suggested having Sean, new engineering recruit, work on checking the new version of FEBio for in situ strain validity. Ben will advise him as necessary.
    • Morphing work is on hold until a decision is made on what assumptions to make.
  5. Review of action items from past meeting.
    • All action items were related to the agenda items; refer to discussions above.
  6. Decide action items for next meeting.
    • See Ongoing Action Items above.
  7. Other.
    • None noted.

RecurringMeetings/2018-06-12 (last edited 2018-06-15 13:11:48 by aerdemir)