Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2010-04-21 13:14:50
Size: 835
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2010-04-21 13:28:04
Size: 3392
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
 * ''Model Name, Key words (generic and specific).''
 * ''Version.''
 * ''Simulation Software.''
 * ''Brief one or two line description.''
 * ''Detailed description, diagrams, equations.''
 * ''Reference to Publication describing the model.''
 * ''Pointer to the publication or pdf.''
 * ''Related Models, antecedents, comparables, and successors.''
Line 14: Line 23:

 * ''Domain definition (cells, mito, tissues, organ system, organism).''
 * ''Main variables (chemicals, pressures, etc.), with units.''
 * ''Parameters, with units, and with source references.''
 * ''Descriptions and references for subsidiary models.''
 * ''Source Code: Clear, deeply commented, explained, referenced.''
 * ''Inputs and outputs defined. All nodes and edges defined.''
 * ''Define linkage type (Chemical, electrical, mechanical,etc.).''
 * ''Ontology base for notation.''
 * ''Numerical solvers used, and conditions set.''
 * ''List of Modeling Assumptions.''
 * ''Subcomponents.''
  * ''Formulation.''
 * ''Solution Strategy.''
Line 17: Line 40:
 * ''Unitary Balance: (units on all variables and parameters).''
 * ''Mass balance: (list constituents whose conservation is checked).''
 * ''Charge balance: (ion currents, membrane potential).''
 * ''Osmotic balance: (volume, total activities, fluxes).''
 * ''Thermodynamic Balance (Haldane constraints on reactions).''
 * ''All equations correct, units balance, with all terms defined.''
 * ''Numerical solutions checked against analytical solutions.''
 * ''Running code supplied in a common format.''
 * ''Solutions show little dependence on time or space step size.''
 * '' Methods for verification defined. Reference model solution?.''
 * ''Attempt to Verify Simulation Software.''
 * ''Mesh Convergence.''
Line 19: Line 55:
 * ''Initial and boundary conditions in accord with physiology.''
 * ''Data provided, and fitted by model.''
 * ''Model is predictive, shown to fit other data not used as basis.''
 * ''Parameters justified (sources provided) and evaluated.''
 * ''Availability of Direct Validation.''
 * ''Availability of Indirect Validation.''
 * ''Comparison with Experimental Data.''
 * ''Comparison with Literature.''
 * ''Procedure Validation with Simplified Representative Problem.''
 * ''Sensitivity Analysis.''
Line 20: Line 67:

 * ''Website source from which to download model code and data.''
 * ''Website or email or address to accept queries.''
 * ''Website for public commentary and responses.''
 * ''References to subsequent publications or alternative models.''
 * ''Online Rating System.''
 * ''Licensing.''

This page contains a literature review of currently available knee models based on finite element analysis. The [http://www.imagwiki.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Working_Group_10#Standards_Proposal Standards proposal], developed by [http://www.imagwiki.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Working_Group_10 Working Group 10 - Model Sharing and Standards] of [http://www.imagwiki.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Main_Page Interagency Modeling and Analysis Group] is specialized for knee modeling, as a guideline for the review process.

TableOfContents

Review Guidelines

Identification & Description

  • Model Name, Key words (generic and specific).

  • Version.

  • Simulation Software.

  • Brief one or two line description.

  • Detailed description, diagrams, equations.

  • Reference to Publication describing the model.

  • Pointer to the publication or pdf.

  • Related Models, antecedents, comparables, and successors.

Model Structure & Content

  • Domain definition (cells, mito, tissues, organ system, organism).

  • Main variables (chemicals, pressures, etc.), with units.

  • Parameters, with units, and with source references.

  • Descriptions and references for subsidiary models.

  • Source Code: Clear, deeply commented, explained, referenced.

  • Inputs and outputs defined. All nodes and edges defined.

  • Define linkage type (Chemical, electrical, mechanical,etc.).

  • Ontology base for notation.

  • Numerical solvers used, and conditions set.

  • List of Modeling Assumptions.

  • Subcomponents.

    • Formulation.

  • Solution Strategy.

Verification

  • Unitary Balance: (units on all variables and parameters).

  • Mass balance: (list constituents whose conservation is checked).

  • Charge balance: (ion currents, membrane potential).

  • Osmotic balance: (volume, total activities, fluxes).

  • Thermodynamic Balance (Haldane constraints on reactions).

  • All equations correct, units balance, with all terms defined.

  • Numerical solutions checked against analytical solutions.

  • Running code supplied in a common format.

  • Solutions show little dependence on time or space step size.

  • Methods for verification defined. Reference model solution?.

  • Attempt to Verify Simulation Software.

  • Mesh Convergence.

Validation

  • Initial and boundary conditions in accord with physiology.

  • Data provided, and fitted by model.

  • Model is predictive, shown to fit other data not used as basis.

  • Parameters justified (sources provided) and evaluated.

  • Availability of Direct Validation.

  • Availability of Indirect Validation.

  • Comparison with Experimental Data.

  • Comparison with Literature.

  • Procedure Validation with Simplified Representative Problem.

  • Sensitivity Analysis.

Availability

  • Website source from which to download model code and data.

  • Website or email or address to accept queries.

  • Website for public commentary and responses.

  • References to subsequent publications or alternative models.

  • Online Rating System.

  • Licensing.

Studies on FEA of the Knee

References

GenerationOne/LiteratureReviewKneeFea (last edited 2016-05-04 22:09:50 by localhost)