Differences between revisions 7 and 8
Revision 7 as of 2015-03-24 15:26:56
Size: 1680
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2015-03-31 12:46:46
Size: 3497
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 34: Line 34:
 * Ahmet & Craig
  * Provide anatomical landmarks on the model.
 * Tara & Robb
  * Read coordinate system section in the Open Knee Users' Guide.
Line 44: Line 40:
 * Callan
  * Register to Simtk.org and e-mail username to Ahmet to added to the project team.
 * Ahmet & Craig
  * Provide anatomical landmarks on the model.
 * Tara & Robb
  * Read coordinate system section in the Open Knee Users' Guide.
Line 46: Line 48:
 * Callan
  * Register to Simtk.org and e-mail username to Ahmet to added to the project team.
Line 54: Line 54:
  * TBD   * Ahmet conducted simulations with kinetic scaling factors of 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001. Only the latter one converged. He also decided to run simulations with a scaling factor of 0.0, which converged. This simulation will evaluate if the applied loads change joint kinematic response after scaling.
  * Ahmet also conducted simulations with decreased anterior cruciate ligament properties, by 1e-6 and by 1e-3. He tried scaling factors of 0.001 and 0.0. Convergence problems were observed.
  * Tara brought up the issue that the kinetics she provided the group after transforming to reference (initial) femur coordinate syste were the actual loads applied by the robot during the experiments not the desired. There are large differences between the desired and applied loads depending when the specimen exhibits pivot shift. She will provide new kinetics data and potentially a simplified one with ramp loading and unloading.
  * Ahmet and Craig discussed potential aliasing of the load curves when step size is coarse. Dividing the load curve to 10 intervals may still induce some aliasing, therefore larger number of intervals may need to be used.
  * Robb indicated that the coordinate systems used in the data and the model can be aligned better if the group can provide him location of anatomical landmarks on the model. The group went over the Open Knee User's Guide where Ahmet pointed out the relevant section on coordinate systems and anatomical landmarks. Ahmet and Craig will extract this information from Open Knee dissemination and provide it to Robb.
  * The group postponed submission of the pivot shift manuscript. Ahmet asked all to think about ideas to enhance and complete the pivot shift study. The group will need to set up new deadlines to push this initiative forward.
Line 56: Line 61:
  * TBD   * See Immediate Action Items above.

Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic Core Team

Date: March 24, 2015

Time: 10:30 AM EST

Means: In person meeting

Attendees:

  1. Ahmet Erdemir
  2. Craig Bennetts
  3. Snehal Chokhandre
  4. Robb Colbrunn
  5. Tara Bonner

Agenda:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
  2. Finalize pivot shift simulation manuscript submission content.
  3. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
  4. Other.

Immediate Action Items:

  • Ahmet
    • Meet with Craig and Snehal for training to use high performance computing and to troubleshoot model convergence.
  • Craig
    • Put oks007 sample MR images on the wiki.
  • Snehal
    • Inform Paul Saluan about postponing the pivot shift study.
    • Test tissue samples at 20%/s and 100%/s rates to evaluate testing capabilities.
    • Continue working on discussion and references for pivot shift simulation manuscript.
  • Tara
    • Provide desired detailed and simplified (ramp) pivot shift profile for simulations.
  • Callan
    • Register to Simtk.org and e-mail username to Ahmet to added to the project team.
  • Ahmet & Craig

    • Provide anatomical landmarks on the model.
  • Tara & Robb

    • Read coordinate system section in the Open Knee Users' Guide.
  • All
    • Come up with deadlines to conduct the rest of pivot shift work.

Notes:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
    • TBD
  2. Finalize pivot shift simulation manuscript submission content.
    • Ahmet conducted simulations with kinetic scaling factors of 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001. Only the latter one converged. He also decided to run simulations with a scaling factor of 0.0, which converged. This simulation will evaluate if the applied loads change joint kinematic response after scaling.
    • Ahmet also conducted simulations with decreased anterior cruciate ligament properties, by 1e-6 and by 1e-3. He tried scaling factors of 0.001 and 0.0. Convergence problems were observed.
    • Tara brought up the issue that the kinetics she provided the group after transforming to reference (initial) femur coordinate syste were the actual loads applied by the robot during the experiments not the desired. There are large differences between the desired and applied loads depending when the specimen exhibits pivot shift. She will provide new kinetics data and potentially a simplified one with ramp loading and unloading.
    • Ahmet and Craig discussed potential aliasing of the load curves when step size is coarse. Dividing the load curve to 10 intervals may still induce some aliasing, therefore larger number of intervals may need to be used.
    • Robb indicated that the coordinate systems used in the data and the model can be aligned better if the group can provide him location of anatomical landmarks on the model. The group went over the Open Knee User's Guide where Ahmet pointed out the relevant section on coordinate systems and anatomical landmarks. Ahmet and Craig will extract this information from Open Knee dissemination and provide it to Robb.
    • The group postponed submission of the pivot shift manuscript. Ahmet asked all to think about ideas to enhance and complete the pivot shift study. The group will need to set up new deadlines to push this initiative forward.
  3. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
    • See Immediate Action Items above.
  4. Other.
    • TBD

RecurringMeetings/2015-03-24 (last edited 2016-05-04 22:09:50 by localhost)