Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2016-07-12 14:19:07
Size: 1063
Editor: aerdemir
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2016-07-25 14:59:07
Size: 3796
Editor: snehalkc
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
 1.    1. Ahmet Erdemir
   2. Snehal Chokhandre
   3. Tara Bonner
   4. Connor Lough
   5. Jason Halloran (Cleveland State University)
   6. Will Zaylor (Cleveland State University)
   7. William
   8. Christina (Cleveland State University)
   9. Robb Colbrunn
Line 28: Line 36:
 *
  *
   * Ahmet
       * Complete reviewing the drafts of data manuscripts.
   * Snehal
       * Continue documentation of tissue testing reproducibility.
       * Evaluate 150 gr load cell to ensure noise does not saturate
       measurements(test meniscus compression sample).
   * Robb and William
     * Continue working on scripts to generate of aggregated contact pressure plots
     for patellofemoral joint manuscript and accommodate suggested changes.
   * Connor
     * Continue updating specifications for comparison of geometries.
   * All
     * Start segmentation based on commitments listed in the Roadmap.
Line 34: Line 53:
  * Action items were related to the agenda items; refer to discussions below.   * Most action items were related to the agenda items; refer to discussions below.
  * Connor created wiki page outlining process for comparing geometries.
  * William wrote scripts for pressure analysis and ran for all specimens. The pngs
  and svgs are in the repository. The svg has unexplained interpolation of data.
  The png doesn’t have the interpolation. May be worth running all specimens with
  same legend so they can be compared. The flexion angles on the figure might be
  backwards/reversed. Need to double check the results and confirm.
Line 36: Line 61:
  *   * Snehal performed repeatability tests over 4 days. Separate cartilage samples
  were tested in confined and unconfined compression. Each day the entire process
  was repeated. Snehal will get the results together.
  * Snehal will do the repeatability for ligament and meniscus tension this week.
  * Snehal had the prototype lab sharpen the tensile punches.
  * Tara will train with Snehal on tissue testing the week of 7/25-29.
Line 38: Line 69:
  *   * Ahmet read through the drafts but needs to review them more thoroughly.
  * His current assessment of drafts is:
   * Imaging :
     * Missing technical validation and usage notes.
     * Specimen table is complete.
   * Tibiofemoral joint testing:
     * Missing figures (all figures should be consistent between papers in style)
     * Need to emphasize our definition of laxity in the papers
     * Figures should show all specimen data instead of mean/standard deviation
   * Patellofemoral joint testing:
     * Technical validation should include sensor recalibration
Line 40: Line 82:
  *   * In the upcoming week all team members will work on segmentation.
Line 43: Line 86:
Line 44: Line 88:
  *   * A static copy of data will be added in dryad with manuscript submissions.
  * Ahmet plans to change licensing to be even more liberal to allow both academic
  and commercial use of data.
  * Desired deadline for submission of manuscripts is early fall.

Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic Core Team

Date: July 12, 2016

Time: 10:30 AM EST

Means: In person meeting

Attendees:

  1. Ahmet Erdemir
  2. Snehal Chokhandre
  3. Tara Bonner
  4. Connor Lough
  5. Jason Halloran (Cleveland State University)
  6. Will Zaylor (Cleveland State University)
  7. William
  8. Christina (Cleveland State University)
  9. Robb Colbrunn

Agenda:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
  2. Discuss progress of tissue testing protocol evaluation.
  3. Discuss progress of joint testing and imaging data manuscripts.
  4. Discuss segmentation plan and progress.
  5. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
  6. Other.

Immediate Action Items:

  • Ahmet
    • Complete reviewing the drafts of data manuscripts.
  • Snehal
    • Continue documentation of tissue testing reproducibility.
    • Evaluate 150 gr load cell to ensure noise does not saturate measurements(test meniscus compression sample).
  • Robb and William
    • Continue working on scripts to generate of aggregated contact pressure plots for patellofemoral joint manuscript and accommodate suggested changes.
  • Connor
    • Continue updating specifications for comparison of geometries.
  • All
    • Start segmentation based on commitments listed in the Roadmap.

Notes:

  1. Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
    • Most action items were related to the agenda items; refer to discussions below.
    • Connor created wiki page outlining process for comparing geometries.
    • William wrote scripts for pressure analysis and ran for all specimens. The pngs and svgs are in the repository. The svg has unexplained interpolation of data. The png doesn’t have the interpolation. May be worth running all specimens with same legend so they can be compared. The flexion angles on the figure might be backwards/reversed. Need to double check the results and confirm.
  2. Discuss progress of tissue testing protocol evaluation.
    • Snehal performed repeatability tests over 4 days. Separate cartilage samples were tested in confined and unconfined compression. Each day the entire process was repeated. Snehal will get the results together.
    • Snehal will do the repeatability for ligament and meniscus tension this week.
    • Snehal had the prototype lab sharpen the tensile punches.
    • Tara will train with Snehal on tissue testing the week of 7/25-29.
  3. Discuss progress of joint testing and imaging data manuscripts.
    • Ahmet read through the drafts but needs to review them more thoroughly.
    • His current assessment of drafts is:
      • Imaging :
        • Missing technical validation and usage notes.
        • Specimen table is complete.
      • Tibiofemoral joint testing:
        • Missing figures (all figures should be consistent between papers in style)
        • Need to emphasize our definition of laxity in the papers
        • Figures should show all specimen data instead of mean/standard deviation
      • Patellofemoral joint testing:
        • Technical validation should include sensor recalibration
  4. Discuss segmentation plan and progress.
    • In the upcoming week all team members will work on segmentation.
  5. Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
    • See Immediate Action Items above.
  6. Other.
    • A static copy of data will be added in dryad with manuscript submissions.
    • Ahmet plans to change licensing to be even more liberal to allow both academic and commercial use of data.
    • Desired deadline for submission of manuscripts is early fall.

RecurringMeetings/2016-07-12 (last edited 2016-07-27 12:04:28 by aerdemir)