|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2016-09-06 12:24:43
Size: 962
Comment:
|
Size: 2855
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| 1. | 1. Ahmet Erdemir 1. Snehal Chokhandre 1. Robb Colbrunn 1. Tara Bonner |
| Line 26: | Line 29: |
| '''Immediate Action Items:''' | '''Ongoing Action Items:''' |
| Line 28: | Line 31: |
| * * |
* Ahmet * Complete reviewing the drafts of data manuscripts. * Snehal * Work on reproducibility testing of confined compression. * Continue reproducibility testing of tension tests. * Implement zero stress-strain estimation to tissue testing analysis code. * All * Continue segmentation based on commitments listed in the Roadmap. |
| Line 34: | Line 43: |
| * | * Most action items were related to the ongoing agenda items; refer to discussions below. |
| Line 36: | Line 45: |
| * | * Snehal did a rubber repeatability tensile test and it looks better than previous tissue testing. She used a higher fine contact load and higher preconditioning strain level. She tried the same technique on tissue. The results were not satisfactory. * It is possible that the reproducibility issue in tensile and confined compression testing maybe due to find contact being done prior to preconditioning but not after, immediately before the actual test loading. The tissue may settle in the clamp or the chamber after pre-conditioning which may shift the displacement at which force starts accumulating, i.e. zero force displacement. This may result in inadequate recruitment of tissue during loading and misleading comparison of force-displacement data. * Snehal will conduct the repeatability tests with the procedure find contact – run preconditioning at high strain levels – find contact again – adjust target strain levels based on new contact point – run test. |
| Line 38: | Line 49: |
| * | * Ahmet still needs to make progress on papers. |
| Line 40: | Line 51: |
| * | * Robb has continued segmenting the patella and patellar cartilage. He asked about generating geomtries from segmentations. Ahmet recommended him to follow the specifications to obtain raw and smoothed surfaces for comparisons. |
| Line 42: | Line 53: |
| * | * See Ongoing Action Items above. |
| Line 44: | Line 55: |
| * | * Ahmet created a model from generation 1- includes only tibia, femur and acl. He created a wiki page for it |
Recurring Meeting of Cleveland Clinic Core Team
Date: September 6, 2016
Time: 10:30 AM EST
Means: In person meeting
Attendees:
- Ahmet Erdemir
- Snehal Chokhandre
- Robb Colbrunn
- Tara Bonner
Agenda:
- Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
- Discuss progress of tissue testing protocol evaluation.
- Discuss progress of joint testing and imaging data manuscripts.
- Discuss segmentation plan and progress.
- Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
- Other.
Ongoing Action Items:
- Ahmet
- Complete reviewing the drafts of data manuscripts.
- Snehal
- Work on reproducibility testing of confined compression.
- Continue reproducibility testing of tension tests.
- Implement zero stress-strain estimation to tissue testing analysis code.
- All
- Continue segmentation based on commitments listed in the Roadmap.
Notes:
- Discuss immediate action items from the last meeting.
- Most action items were related to the ongoing agenda items; refer to discussions below.
- Discuss progress of tissue testing protocol evaluation.
- Snehal did a rubber repeatability tensile test and it looks better than previous tissue testing. She used a higher fine contact load and higher preconditioning strain level. She tried the same technique on tissue. The results were not satisfactory.
- It is possible that the reproducibility issue in tensile and confined compression testing maybe due to find contact being done prior to preconditioning but not after, immediately before the actual test loading. The tissue may settle in the clamp or the chamber after pre-conditioning which may shift the displacement at which force starts accumulating, i.e. zero force displacement. This may result in inadequate recruitment of tissue during loading and misleading comparison of force-displacement data.
- Snehal will conduct the repeatability tests with the procedure find contact – run preconditioning at high strain levels – find contact again – adjust target strain levels based on new contact point – run test.
- Discuss progress of joint testing and imaging data manuscripts.
- Ahmet still needs to make progress on papers.
- Discuss segmentation plan and progress.
- Robb has continued segmenting the patella and patellar cartilage. He asked about generating geomtries from segmentations. Ahmet recommended him to follow the specifications to obtain raw and smoothed surfaces for comparisons.
- Decide immediate action items for the next meeting.
- See Ongoing Action Items above.
- Other.
- Ahmet created a model from generation 1- includes only tibia, femur and acl. He created a wiki page for it